Will Naval ever be useful? ;-;

Discussion in 'Planetary Annihilation General Discussion' started by Tormidal, July 19, 2014.

  1. portable

    portable Active Member

    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    50
    Agreed, the TA naval game was better than the PA naval game, and I think that the size of the models something to do with that.

    That said, in TA, the ocean was used as a means of navigation between disconnected places. That role is served by the orbital layer in PA. Consequently, there are no oceans in PA, just big lakes. Since PA naval cannot walk on land, that means that you end up with an unsatisfying turtle strategy if you go naval.

    My personal wish list for PA naval is that it:
    1. should be amphibious,
    2. the ship models smaller, and that
    3. commanders should be able to be completely submerged.

    And no, I don't think we need torpedo bombers.
  2. pivo187

    pivo187 Active Member

    Messages:
    555
    Likes Received:
    167
    I agree naval needs serious lovin. Naval in TA was awesome. Ships feel utterly weak in PA, slow, & just overall useless.
  3. pieman2906

    pieman2906 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    517
    Likes Received:
    382
    I Think Naval should have the best surface to air capabilities. Naval are only ever going to be a supporting role or non-existent on most planets. For planets that do have lakes or other large water bodies, there should be a reason to get naval supremacy of that water. Currently, on most planets, it's easier to just go for air dominance, that way you control all of your surface with the same unit blobs, be it land or water.

    Strong Naval AA would effectively mean that an enemy held lake is a serious no-fly zone for your aircraft, unless you're planning to take some pretty heavy losses to force them out.

    Naval should also have access to some of the biggest unit mounted guns, since, you know, they're naval. You can afford to give ships stupid powerful guns, because they're already limited to water as a drawback.

    At the same time, amphibious units should be kinda rubbish on land compared to other land units, since what you're paying for in metal is versatility, rather than pure combat cost effectiveness, similar in water. At the moment, slammers (which totally shouldn't be amphib, need a different unit for the amphib role) completely wreck naval, which shouldn't be the case. You've paid for an already pretty decent land unit, you should not get amphibious capability and superior naval combat ability essentially thrown in for free.

    EDIT: and by rubbish i don't necessarily mean worse in combat, they could merely be more expensive, making them a less cost effective option unless you're planning to take advantage of the versatility you're paying for in the cost of the unit.
    damnhippie likes this.
  4. pivo187

    pivo187 Active Member

    Messages:
    555
    Likes Received:
    167
    I agree. There needs to be some serious balance between land bot air and orbital...Right now I feel like bots are too weak, air is way too OP as well as orbital, naval is crap, and land is so so
  5. Imsvale

    Imsvale Active Member

    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    58
    The general rule for ship movement should be low acceleration, but decent top speed. They should feel a bit sluggish; but since it's going to take them that much longer to move into position, it better be worth it. Immense firepower and reasonable health, so you didn't send these slow buggers all the way across the map for nothing. They need to be proper floating fortresses and people should fear them.

    At the moment I feel like an idiot trying to make use of ships. Uber should go ahead and crank ships up to max OP, and then tone them down just a tad for the sake of balance (*cough* T1 bombers *cough*). That's how ships should feel. Even the notion that you could put a shipyard down in a channel to crank out a few ships for fire support should be a genuine worry for your opponent.
  6. nateious

    nateious Active Member

    Messages:
    409
    Likes Received:
    212
    Try navel in the TA mod, TA:Escalation, it's everything that was awesome about TA navel cranked up to 11.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    GoodOak and ace63 like this.
  7. cdrkf

    cdrkf Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    4,793
    Also Naval in Balanced Annihilation (Spring) is pretty epic (especially the 'epoch' flag ship- an exercise of 'how many guns can you fit on one boat anyway?'). Now when you add in sea planes (all VTOL) and Hovercraft platoons into the mix it gets really epic!
    Nicb1 and nateious like this.
  8. metabolical

    metabolical Uber Alumni

    Messages:
    312
    Likes Received:
    1,366
    We did a pass for naval when we did everything else, so I would call that recent. I haven't heard that people have played naval that much to try it though.
    duncane and ArchieBuld like this.
  9. stuart98

    stuart98 Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,009
    Likes Received:
    3,888
    Naval is too slow and doesn't do enough to land. I'd say increase the speed overall, I think the RCBM has naval speed in a good place. I'd also increase the weapon range on the destroyer by ~20-40.
  10. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,357
    Random question, will there ever be waves caused by ships, or splashes when shells hit the water, dynamic fluid basically. It was in Spring and wasn't detrimental to performance, do you know if this will ever happen or even be possible in the engine?
  11. Dementiurge

    Dementiurge Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,094
    Likes Received:
    693
    I only played TA singleplayer. All I remember from TA naval (which is actually fairly recent) was not being able to see anything because of the fog of war, shooting at little red dots with cruisers because they did everything better than anything else, and seeing stupidly expensive ships sink to weapons fire because they're stuck in a naval traffic jam.
  12. Alpha2546

    Alpha2546 Post Master General

    Messages:
    977
    Likes Received:
    1,561
    I played with naval a bit today and i thought it wasn't that bad. It gave me a stronghold to recover but to also put some pressure on the enemy (Leviathans are nice for that. I still miss something thats like pretty strong close range (something that can annihilate units at the coast)
  13. nateious

    nateious Active Member

    Messages:
    409
    Likes Received:
    212
    I haven't played Spring in ages but i used to play Absolute Annihilation which I think BA was based off of. I love how many guns can you fit on a boat philosophy. Real battleships had dozens if not hundreds of guns (of varying sizes) and are hundreds of times more massive than say a tank, so I really like the idea of crazy powerful, crazy big boats that utterly dominate the seas and the surrounding shoreline.

    The unofficial patch (available on www.tauniverse.com) vastly improves pathfinding in TA. TA:Escalation integrates this patch. I've played games with hundreds of ships and not had any real issues with traffic jams. Yes I did have times where my longer ranged ships were firing at radar dots, but such is the nature of any long range weapon in a RTS.
    Last edited: July 24, 2014
  14. doomrater

    doomrater Active Member

    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    59
    I played a little naval and even had a PTE naval battle with the computer. I made sure my commander stayed out of dodge with that one, but the naval was definitely fun, though I started to tip the scales a bit with anchors to ensure that I was doing tickle damage while I assisted a naval factory with orbital builders so I could have an army NAO. Didn't get to see advanced naval as there wasn't a point.

    Can we get an anti-orbital naval unit? Seems weird to have floating fortresses that do tons of damage but have to build stationary laser turrets that shoot into outer space to protect them from Anchors.
  15. KNight

    KNight Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,681
    Likes Received:
    3,268
    I don't see why it'd need to be a dynamic fluid simulation? Just going about it in a similar manner to SupCom should be enough no?

    Mike
  16. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,357
    Because it was so pretty ;3

    But yeah I'd be alright with Supcom level of water, Spring's dynamic water just looked so nice. :p
    sycspysycspy and cdrkf like this.
  17. Imsvale

    Imsvale Active Member

    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    58
    Most planet configs being used are not watery enough (or at all) to warrant (enable) the use of naval. Even with more water, air is going to be preferred, partly because of the reputation ships now have picked up.

    Would you say the feel of ships is where you want it to be in the current state? Because if you ask me, it's not difficult to see for yourself that the use of ships is incredibly cumbersome. Air is just easier. I don't know if the AA boost will apply to ships; that might change things slightly (can't combat ships with bombers as easily). But ships are still very, very slow and clumsy, and they're just frustrating to use.
  18. MrTBSC

    MrTBSC Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,857
    Likes Received:
    1,823
    "if you don't like vanila balance there are mods"
    there should never be a reason to have to use mods for balancereasons ...
    in this case i rather would like modders and devs to find solutions together for vanila balance...
    mods should be optional for different gaming expierences ... they shouldn't ever be mandatory to get the proper maingameexperience out of vanilla ...
    ace63 and stuart98 like this.
  19. onyxia2

    onyxia2 Member

    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    18
    Oddly enough I'm starting to think the people (modders) can balance a game better than the developer, especially the incompetent Blizzard (because David Kim is a total ******* moron) and maybe Uber ;p But nonetheless mods better not be required to balance a game! Mods should be the equivalent of the Starcraft Map editor custom maps and nothing else!
  20. pivo187

    pivo187 Active Member

    Messages:
    555
    Likes Received:
    167
    Man that pic of ta looks better than pa lol I agree the world's of pa just aren't as nice as supcom or ta. I really hope naval can can get to the point of ta and supcom
    Last edited: August 2, 2014

Share This Page