What your K/D in Black Ops?

I feel bad for all the man-hours put into programming all the guns that aren't the FAMAS. I also feel bad for the people getting drawn into a silly flamewar over an inexplicably popular game.

Treyarch tried to balance it, but ended up failing miserably. I blame it on the developers' badness. They all have like <1 K/Ds lol. :lol:

Have you seen JD 2020's stats? He has a negative K/D with like a 11 W/L. Can you say carried? lol...

No no no, sir... He "plays the objective."

Ugh, I hate the typical bad CoD player mindset.

"OMG OVERPOWER WEPON NOOB"

I use a lot of weapons, but I always have classes with the best weapons because sometimes I don't like getting BSed by terrible game mechanics.

a lot of made in this topic

Congrats, you're in the .1% then.

Problem is, there shouldn't be a "best weapon" in a game where you pick what weapon you spawn with. Can you imagine if you could choose any weapon to spawn with in the Halo series, or Quake?

Also, real men use a Riot Shield.

FAMAS isn't even much better than the guns below it.

Halo and Quake have power weapons and are therefore incomparable to CoD.

and just no at the riot shield comment. Only little kids and the like seem to use riot shields. All they do is slow down the pace of the game.

2.3, most used guns are the M16 and the Enfield. Both at around 1600 I think.

First off Black Ops is not a bad game. It is designed well and a lot of things have good meaning but don't really .. do good. Prepare for wall of text.

Second chance has it's place in the CoD series. They AREN'T going to take it out. However, it is annoying and the bs that surrounds it is annoying as hell. I'm unsure if they are able to fix it in the sense of the shooting on the way down and being unkillable for a second or something like that.
Out of say, the 3 hours, I played tonight, about 1 time did I get killed by someone in it. And even then, I can just say to myself, "That guy is ****, we're going to win the match, meh".
It really isn't a huge OMG FIX.

Camping. Ah, the retards excuse for failing. In common cases people will say:
- You camp because you can't get kills otherwise.
- You camp because your bad at the game.

What would be the problem with this anyway. If you tried getting kills all other ways and this was the only one that worked for you, you would do it right?
Also, if I'm bad at the game, then how did I just go 40-1, and you go 3-18? Makes so much sense.

Okay so I will explain what is really the problem. The killstreaks. Treyarch and Infinity ward introduce this awesome new killstreaks in MW2. You get to fly planes, use sentry guns, have huge bombers cover maps in fire and explosions. Pretty cool eh? Yeah well you need to have 8/10/11 whatever kills to get it. This forces people to sit back and allow people to come to you so that you can obtain these streaks. And once you get them, you can rain hell on people. BUT you can also counter them. Perks like Ghost stop from being seen, and everyone has access to having one class with a LAW missile. Only yourself to blame if you start getting pounded hard.

Also with a huge move in the CoD community, thousands of youtube videos express these huge scores by using killstreaks, causing people to also try it themselves. Only the developers to blame, but really would they see this coming?

Playing in party has a huge affect on Call of Duty just like most games accept a little more extreme. Over the last week or so, I started using hupitgaming.com Some of you may have heard of it. Helps you basically get a team going fro lots of games, active forums, youtube, ect. Very helpful. So helpful infact my K/D and W/L have grown by 0.5 and I've never had so much fun on the game. No longer do I have to worry about GHOST or SECOND CHANCE, because we have Blackbirds in the air all the time, at least 2 people with Strela-3s, communication, teamwork. And campers? :lol: We are so far in their spawn we are the ones camping.

Next is the whole OP GUN DERP. And I'm telling you now no gun is OP. Let me break it down for you nice and slow. There will always be a BEST GUN in it's CLASS. Let's take a drop through history. These are all stats wise too.
CoD4 - MP5 (best SMG), M16 (best AR). That was about it for cod4.
WaW - MP40 and probably the Carbine or STG.
MW2 - M16/Famas and UMP45.

Yet if you patched any of these guns, there would always be a new gun which would be the best. "most overpowered" and people would still complain. If they changed the famas. People would start using another gun and the cycle would continue.

Anyway, that was my 2 cents to defend a game.

Oh also,

Yes, because MNC takes so much "skill". Pick Support, hold RT, juice, repeat. Nice one. And being host means I can guarantee going 40-0 every game against randoms. I HAVE SO MUCH SKILL :|

^Just so you know, HUPIT is where all the noobs hang out.

Way more than Call of Duty, in public matches anyway. You can run around using a last resort melee weapon as if it were a perfectly apt primary and get an insane score. As long as you have a way to kill an opponent in a very quick, unavoidable manner, a shooter will never take "skill" like Starcraft or something does. Deal with it and play the better ones. (*cough*notblackops)

Checked my PC games, pseudo-stalker?

Ah, but it still is better. I dislike the way modern shooters are designing their weapons. Why can't we just go back to the days of, at most, two variants of each weapon - Pistol, SMG, Assault Rifle, Shotgun, Sniper Rifle? At least that would stop the complaining about certain weapons being overpowered.

True, but see above for my reasoning on that particular difference.

So what does "omg iv almost got a care pakage id beter camp" do to the pace of the game, then? If you get biffed twice on the nose by someone charging at you with a piece of plastic, you probably deserved it. Also, watching the pro pipes and grenades crash around you while you capture a point is great.

No. It is a bad game. A really bad game. This isn't even opinion or argueable.

You tell me that the top 10% of the leaderboards doesn't get there with 2 weapons. You tell me sniper rifles weren't the only thing that once was nearly as good as those 2 weapons, and they nerfed it straight to hell in this game to prevent skilled players with rifles from using it against non-skilled players with those 2 weapons (yes, quick scope snipers took way more skill than taking a dose your favorite trucker speed and running around with and smg, or camping in a corner with a weapon of accuracy and output). YOU TELL ME, JUST TELL ME, that this game didn't require a limit-breaking title update within the first day of release, and microsoft gave in to pressure and allowed it (a good business move, but if I was in charge I would decline that update and watch from the roof of a building as n00bs burn their xboxes in the streets crying butthurt over a poorly designed game).

It is proveably and supportably a badly designed game, by every definition. The reason people buy it IS because of bandwagon appeal to that brand. To be good at that game, you have to be terribad; If you are bad at that game, that is because the game wasn't designed to reward skill anyway. I didn't play it enough to see how decent I am (no doubt I am probably up there), but if I did somehow suck horribly, I would take it as a compliment with honor. Yes world, I suck at this game, because this game inversely rewards skill, and I am just that skilled.

Every time someone complains of MNC glitches and gameplay being bad, I want to hold a Black Ops disk up to their face, and punch the disk through their mouthhole, breaking it to pieces that are crammed down their throat with my fist. What is that taste? Blood? Close. That taste is what a bad game REALLY tastes like. Before that, you had NO CLUE what a bad game tasted like, so you may now thank me for your enlightenment, and I will also accept an apology torwards MNC afterwards.

/rant

did anyone else get really turned on by this, or is that just me?

HUPIT FAEG

Who thinks like that? People usually throw their care package, get it, and move on. Maybe be people (like you are demonstrating) think like that, and bad people aren't really much of a problem anyway.

I never even said I get killed by riot shielders, just that they slow the pace of the game. Whenever I come across one I'm like "oh great, another faggot with a riot shield" and he just stares at me or maybe tries to throwing knife me or C4 me. Every once in a while I might get killed if I'm stunned to close but for the most part they're just there to be annoying. Sometimes if there are riot shielders on the other team I will switch to my OMA DC noob tube class and camp with claymores just to spite them.

What's wrong with Hupit? :|

I think you misunderstood me - when people get close to a certain killstreak, they will play extremely cautiously. This slows the pace down, as does the ability to go prone, equipment such as the Claymore, extremely powerful explosive weapons...

Marathon, Lightweight and Commando - Blast Shield/Smoke for Domination, Knife/Stun for Deathmatch. I choose survival in a world of two-shot kills. I choose...Riot Shield.