This, is what PA will have to top.

RCIX · November 17, 2012

flandersned said:

This thread has degenerated from informed discussion to ANOTHER flame war about whether SupCom2 was good or not. This can go on forever and it WILL go on forever unless we stop now.
Click to expand...

This:

rcix said:

They can be described as flaws and as strengths. Respectively, tiers end up creating too many units with role overlap (at least in SC1 and FA), and flow economy resulted in it being more Economic Combat Simulator 2009 than an RTS. Tiers also add a wonderful sense of escalation and flow economy adds a lot of interesting stuff to do.
Click to expand...

is an odd description of "flaming".

FlandersNed · November 18, 2012

rcix said:

flandersned said:

This thread has degenerated from informed discussion to ANOTHER flame war about whether SupCom2 was good or not. This can go on forever and it WILL go on forever unless we stop now.
Click to expand...

This:

rcix said:

They can be described as flaws and as strengths. Respectively, tiers end up creating too many units with role overlap (at least in SC1 and FA), and flow economy resulted in it being more Economic Combat Simulator 2009 than an RTS. Tiers also add a wonderful sense of escalation and flow economy adds a lot of interesting stuff to do.
Click to expand...

is an odd description of "flaming".
Click to expand...

I was talking about what came before and not that post in particular.

This, is what PA will have to top.

RCIX Member

FlandersNed Member

Share This Page

This, is what PA will have to top.

RCIX Member

FlandersNed Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches