The sorian PA: TITANS AI thread

Discussion in 'PA: TITANS: General Discussion' started by Quitch, August 24, 2015.

  1. Going4Quests

    Going4Quests Active Member

    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    71
    Well so shortly recapped: if you lose, you can send your commander to a gas giant with orbital fab and get jigs up. Build a space fleet and you win anyway.
  2. Quitch

    Quitch Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,856
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    Does debug no longer do anything?
  3. Sorian

    Sorian Official PA

    Messages:
    998
    Likes Received:
    3,844
    It should.
  4. Quitch

    Quitch Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,856
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    In that case I'm doing something wrong or it's not working as intended.
  5. Going4Quests

    Going4Quests Active Member

    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    71
    @Sorian We're hosting in PTE 8 absurd ais fighitng each other in teams of 2 in PAX on the PTE. You can still join the spectate, but there is much wrong with the AI.. You should check yourself if possible. :p
  6. Sorian

    Sorian Official PA

    Messages:
    998
    Likes Received:
    3,844
    I have made so many improvements locally that spectating this will probably not help much.

    I will run a quick test with the same set up to double check.
    temeter and squishypon3 like this.
  7. Going4Quests

    Going4Quests Active Member

    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    71
    Alright. :)
  8. vaaish

    vaaish New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    6
    @Sorian Could we make the AI much less excited about building Ragnaroks? In almost every game against the AI they start building these for no benefit. For instance, my last game the friendly AI started building one on a moon that was locked down and had no enemy activity (it would have been for more advantageous to build halleys). In the same game, I "won" because both AI's on the enemy team decided have a race to see who could build a ragnarok next to their commander the fastest. It was tie.

    About the only time I want to see the AI building a Ragnarok is on planets they don't control or are losing and don't have friendly commanders.
    klavohunter and stuart98 like this.
  9. Sorian

    Sorian Official PA

    Messages:
    998
    Likes Received:
    3,844
    Already made modifications to that.
    klavohunter, cdrkf, Remy561 and 3 others like this.
  10. vaaish

    vaaish New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    6
    Cool. Good to hear. :)
  11. Quitch

    Quitch Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,856
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    AI rolled its force to this spot and attacked the air factory. However, its Inferno remained stationary and did not close in. The Bolos were not microing.

    Not sure if it was holding them here (rear of the enemy base on Berg) for some other purpose, or if this is an attack order gone wrong.

    Attached Files:

  12. Going4Quests

    Going4Quests Active Member

    Messages:
    238
    Likes Received:
    71
    I noticed also something I'm not entirely sure about. In GW, my subcommander send a full fleet of air fighters to idle at the base, just waiting till there were all destroyed. He repeated this a few times to get vision on the commander.

    Should he be doing that? Seems like an army waste to me. :p
  13. theseeker2

    theseeker2 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    469
    I actually lost a match to the AI's reckless Ragnarok building... He had his commander on one planet, controlled a second, and I controlled a moon. He Ragnarok'd the second planet so I was basically incapable of using the halleys that I had built on my moon, the match would have ended in a draw.
  14. Engineer1234

    Engineer1234 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    291
    Can anyone tell me where the AI fabber build limit moved to ? it used to be in a file called ai.config or something but that no longer exists.
  15. Sorian

    Sorian Official PA

    Messages:
    998
    Likes Received:
    3,844
    It is part of the AI personality now.

    ui\main\game\new_game\js\ai.js
  16. Quitch

    Quitch Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,856
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    Queller never built nukes here, despite having no cost checks associated with the building of nukes.

    Code:
    {
          "name": "Platinum - Nuke Missile",
          "to_build": "NukeMissile",
          "instance_count": -1,
          "min_num_assisters": 3,
          "max_num_assisters": 12,
          "priority": 151,
          "builders": [
            "NukeSilo"
          ],
          "build_conditions": [
            [
              {
                "test_type": "HasPersonalityTag",
                "string0": "platinum",
                "boolean": true
              },
              {
                "test_type": "FactoryHasOpenSlot"
              }
            ]
          ]
        },
        {
          "name": "Platinum - Nuke Missile - No Antis",
          "to_build": "NukeMissile",
          "instance_count": 2,
          "min_num_assisters": 8,
          "max_num_assisters": 12,
          "priority": 478,
          "builders": [
            "NukeSilo"
          ],
          "build_conditions": [
            [
              {
                "test_type": "HasPersonalityTag",
                "string0": "platinum",
                "boolean": true
              },
              {
                "test_type": "FactoryHasOpenSlot"
              },
              {
                "test_type": "FocusTargetThreat",
                "string0": "AntiNuke",
                "compare0": "<=",
                "value0": 0
              }
            ]
          ]
        },

    Attached Files:

  17. Quitch

    Quitch Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,856
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    I think the AI runs into trouble if its rally point falls on wreckage. I've seen two groups of units on either side of a wrecked factory fail to move until finally engaged by an enemy group, which seemed to get them unstuck. In the attacked red's entire army is sitting in the base and failing to move. What the screenshot doesn't show is that the Sparks legs are moving frantically, but no one is moving anywhere.

    Appearing in the logs are the following:

    [21:34:23.516] ERROR failed to fix formation slot pos
    [21:34:23.516] ERROR failed to fix formation slot pos
    [21:34:23.516] ERROR failed to fix formation slot pos
    [21:34:23.532] ERROR failed to fix formation slot pos
    [21:34:23.532] ERROR failed to fix formation slot pos
    [21:34:23.532] ERROR failed to fix formation slot pos

    However, these appear between simtime 0:09:00 and 0:10:00

    Attached Files:

  18. Sorian

    Sorian Official PA

    Messages:
    998
    Likes Received:
    3,844
    Already have a fix for the rally point in wreckage issue.
    stuart98, devoh, Remy561 and 2 others like this.
  19. devoh

    devoh Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    404
    ok, statements like this make me giddy. Granted I do get giddy easily. :)
    stuart98 likes this.
  20. dudeinblack

    dudeinblack New Member

    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    5
    is there any news on an option to disable nukes for the AI?
    I loved the options from Supcom, and would like to see the AI use everything but nukes for AI vs AI battles

Share This Page