I should've probably clarified better which is why I think you misunderstand me. If one looks at the comparative sex IQ distribution, this person will see that there are more women with an average IQ than man. However, that also means that there are less women with extremely high( IQ 125+) and low (IQ ~83). One can also see that there more men with very low IQs and very high IQs, but less man with an average IQ. The IQ range for men is therefore much more extreme. For jobs at the top of a complex dominance hierarchie you need to have a high IQ, because you have to execute alot of complecated actions. This partially explains why there are fewer women in top positions. Ofcourse you know some women who are excellent engineers and I never said they couldn't be excellent engineers. However, if you look at the average of jobs occupied by women, most of them choose not to be an engineer, or something similar, when they are free to choose whatever they want to be. NOTE: This is not me saying women are stupid. Women, in most cases, are wiser than men although there are more men with a higher IQ than women. Like I said in my previous post, when you encourage equality of outcome, the differences between man and women only get larger. When you only encourage one gender to occupy certain jobs you are actually discriminating against the other gender.