WIP: Supply as a box. Stay inside the box. Both supply-top and supply-bottom felt pretty arbitrary, so I'm trying to find a representation where I don't have to stop and think every time I look at it.
The next step is likely adding options for some of the units. In theory styles could be done as well. Color update:
Mostly got it switched back under a super-class. Red/Green or resource-color (or perhaps status color as the stock game is doing now) ?
## 3.0.0 - Supply is a box with the demand bar inside - Setting for net amount display: bot fabbers, percent, or standard - Settable theme, classic black or, inverse: color coding in the bar backdrop - Now depends on Settings Manager
Galactic: Almost a no-op. Upside: no more extra layers of tables in the status bar. Going to be total rewrite of the html, and probably a lot of CSS.
Here's a joke: Apparently one of the hacks for the mythical vertical centering is to define your height with border-width.
I just installed on PAMM and then got a weird Encrypted File System popup... then I ran the tool to see what's up and I find this. What's this?
I had that same weird popup today but dismissed it as windows being stupid. So your command to find "encrypted files" yields me this: And indeed the explorer marks these files as "special": If I look into the properties of that folder it is shown as "encrypted". No idea what that is supposed to mean though, as I can freely edit the files or remove the "encrypted" flag. Weird window is weird. I think wondible uses a mac, maybe it somehow marks the file in a way that makes windows act a bit weird?
Crude version on github, still ugly but barely serviceable. I haven't looked at the alternate color scheme, just assume it's broken. I'm just about ready to punt and shadow out the CSS file.
Gross Economy 4.0.0 - Update for Galactic phase UI - Nuke the CSS from orbit, it's the only way to be sure - Add icon
I noticed that you're cutting all the extra zeroes out in the difference between income and use on both power and metal. Would it be possible to say -3K instead of -3? It's just a bit more readable. (I'm missing 3000 power, not 3... how the hell did I get 3 power use out of something!? )