Rate the sig of the user above you!

I'm tempted to rate the sig but the link seems to be broken...

"IP banned"?

Moving on, the avatar is...colorful.

I give it a Blue/Purple

Can someone who isn't IP banned rate my new signature? (btw, the link won't work unless you are/wish-to-be registered anyway)

Added a new small but effective picture. Took some time to make.

Speaking of, I had to do something funky to even see your sig, but that's probably error on my end. 10/10, always like killing camped firebases.

Let me respond. (I'm on a proxy right now.)

Your head is WAY TOO BIG. WAY. It makes you look like a toddler dressed up in an Assault costume.

I like being a part of the other half though.

3/something clever.

I suppose the head may be a bit off ratio. In my defence, so is the rifle, and the rifle wasn't even my fault.

It is supposed to be a bit top heavy of a picture anyway, but I was too lazy to make the picture lean forward (to make it seem balanced), so it looks a bit off ratio because it leans back but gets bigger at the top anyway.

Fair enough...

Pretty nice. I likey.

I want that achievement. Also Pit Girl against that flag looks pretty sweet.

Animated mine. Sweet?

Glad I'm not epileptic. Still doesn't do good for my eyes.

Still, it looks nice.

Bro your sig makes me think ive been smoking plastic, its a bit too much mate.

Let's just say it's not very Tranquil, Bro.

bro: your signatures; ALL of them, lack any kind of balance or organization.

the objects in them are always awkwardly placed and do not fit well with the background/each other.

the choice of color is generally poor, such as red/blue and other colors that fit together poorly.

more is not always better, especially in the sense of forum signatures. short, sweet, and to the point is the best way to go with forum signatures.

and finally, the photoshopped images you take and tape together to make signatures do not blend in well and they all look like they were added in using microsoft paint.

all in all reminds me of something a child would make at daycare and his parents would add to the fridge purely because they feel obligated to do so.

2/10

whoever goes next may rate pure evils signature.

Evil: Simple and effective.

FuttBuck: I preferred when you had an image sig.

Tom: I remember seeing that tacked up on a classroom wall.

I have to say it was quite interesting to read the history behind this statement, and the moral of it can still be used today, I like it.

10/10

I still like yours.

BroT, PLEASE fix that .gif so it's not so obnoxious.

It's almost as if you don't want anyone to read anything you write. You make sigs that are hard on the eyes and your writing style is, for lack of a better word, repulsive.


Plumbum, I love it!

9/10

:lol:

Direct response to...well, he knows who.

8/

I know what I am doing.

Example 1: The flashing color palette is only supposed to hint at 2 colors, Red and Blue. The rest are hues that lead up to the two. It is only six colors, and they build up from light to dark, eventually hitting red and blue. 2 colors with some glow, not only showed control and creativity and understanding, but IMO are not over the edge.

Example 2: IDK if this is just me, but I rather dislike common color/texture blends as backgrounds, whether the "color scheme" matches or not. I'd rather have a background of the moneyball area, since you know, it is in the game, and makes sense that an assault would be standing there, instead of the Hypersphere Venue on Guitar Hero.

Example 3: I see plenty of non-subtle animated signatures, on these forums and others. My favorite so far is the one that flashes between "heal, hurt, shoot, bacon, bomb, hack, churro". Good stuff.

All this together makes me believe that the reaction over my appropriate-sized subtle signature doesn't deserve an outcry that all of hitler's actions didn't get until he invaded poland (lolwasjusttryingtoappeasehim). C'mon, I have friends with epilepsy, it isn't that frekin bad most of the time.

tl;dr