Poll. Experimentals/tier 4/super-units

Discussion in 'Planetary Annihilation General Discussion' started by nightnord, August 31, 2012.

?

How experimentals should be implemented to be best?

  1. I like TA approch. You just build it and you just won. Easy and simple

    7 vote(s)
    10.1%

  2. Absent experimental - best experimental. We don't need them in PA. They only lead to micromanagement

    18 vote(s)
    26.1%

  3. I like SupCom approach. They should be very costly, but not restricted in count. Most of times battl

    21 vote(s)
    30.4%

  4. I like SupCom 2 approach. Just add MOAR experimental units, including small ones. Just like few addi

    11 vote(s)
    15.9%

  5. I like MF approach. Give a fairly costed facility to assemble super-units. Don't restrict the count.

    1 vote(s)
    1.4%

  6. I like MF approach, but PA is about masses, not about single units. Restrict them in count, so they

    9 vote(s)
    13.0%

  7. I like MF approach, but it should be applicable only to commander. It's unique, anyway, so why not m

    2 vote(s)
    2.9%
Page 2 of 2
  1. gearsb

    gearsb New Member

    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    As long as I can have giant laser spiders and mega tanks in my armies, I'm happy.
    gearsb, September 3, 2012
    #21
  2. Ice36bc

    Ice36bc New Member

    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    i do like super units. bot the have to many hitpoints. its okay if the have reasonable hitpoints and good dps and cant do anything alone bat the need the normal units for support.

    i hate it when one unit can walk in to your base and it regenerate faster then your units can damage it its not practical.
    Ice36bc, September 3, 2012
    #22
  3. nightnord

    nightnord New Member

    Messages:
    382
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's veterancy and it's crap. It wouldn't be in PA, hopefully (see confirmed features thread).

    P.S. BWT, "but" ;)
    nightnord, September 3, 2012
    #23
Page 2 of 2

Share This Page