For Supcom 2 (a reply to all the SC2 fans on these forums)

Discussion in 'Planetary Annihilation General Discussion' started by ta4life, November 15, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SleepWarz

    SleepWarz Active Member

    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    30
    Re: For Supcom 2 (a reply to all the SC2 fans on these forum

    How old are you?

    I honestly don't see anyone over 20 enjoying supcom 2 IF they first played either TA, or Supcom.

    They many removed the things that made supcom uniquely supcom, and added a ton of casual based gameplay for accessibility. Couple that with the silly unit names, the awful flow field pathfinding, research tree. That worked out great!
  2. RCIX

    RCIX Member

    Messages:
    664
    Likes Received:
    16
    Re: For Supcom 2 (a reply to all the SC2 fans on these forum

    Not really relevant.

    It did work out great, that is, if you're not pathologically allergic to change. =/
  3. jurgenvonjurgensen

    jurgenvonjurgensen Active Member

    Messages:
    573
    Likes Received:
    65
    Re: For Supcom 2 (a reply to all the SC2 fans on these forum

    SupCom2: Even its fans think playing it is like being punched in the chest. I went in to SupCom2 with an open mind. I wanted it to be good. And then it wasn't. You seem to be confusing "being open minded" and "having low standards".
  4. eukanuba

    eukanuba Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    899
    Likes Received:
    343
    Re: For Supcom 2 (a reply to all the SC2 fans on these forum

    ITT: rcix likes SupCom2, other people don't. Futile back and forth conversation ensues.

    We now return you to your scheduled fruitless debate:
  5. SleepWarz

    SleepWarz Active Member

    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    30
    Re: For Supcom 2 (a reply to all the SC2 fans on these forum

    Changed for the worse. SupCom2 should have been an ENTIRELY different title and not a sequel to a tried and true formula. The only thing they did better, looks wise, are the maps. Balance and design wise, they were pretty bad. Its like if an automaker all of a sudden decided square wheels were a better standard option while everybody spoke out that round wheels are obviously more functional. And they go ahead and build a square wheeled car that nobody wants, after all of the warnings from the community. A devolution of the series if you will. They may as well of dropped base building so they would have more time to come up with silly names for their units.

    DLC, for games that used to put out FREE units and FREE maps.
  6. RCIX

    RCIX Member

    Messages:
    664
    Likes Received:
    16
    Re: For Supcom 2 (a reply to all the SC2 fans on these forum

    >is fan
    >did not feel like i was getting punched in the chest

    You were saying?
    Why didn't you like it?
  7. Col_Jessep

    Col_Jessep Moderator Alumni

    Messages:
    4,227
    Likes Received:
    257
    Re: For Supcom 2 (a reply to all the SC2 fans on these forum

    Do you guys know where this discussion leads? Nowhere. I have seen this SupCom2 discussion a couple of dozen times now and it hasn't changed since day 1 back on the GPG forum. The whole discussion is futile and always has been.

    I'm locking this down because this discussion invariably leads to flaming and trolling as the last 2.5 years have shown. (Not to mention that fingers were already pointed on page 2.)
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page