Excellent job with the new icons!

Standing applauding the new build

The first icon on the second row

I like them, The only thing I would change is the sniper bot and missile bot icons. Too similar for such different rolls in my (opin)onion. Just my opinion

Only reason I did that was to say, they both have long range (the two dots), and then the sniper is direct fire so it has a straight line, the missile bot isn't direct so it has an arch. Might consider making them have special icons though..

Reverse fabricator and combat fabber, it's much more important to me to see fabbers at a glance, combat fabbers already get caught in combat unit selections so that's less important.

Missile and sniper bots need clearer differentiation.

What about these?

Not gonna lie, I can't tell what the hell is what from the new icons. It's a bunch of dots and slashes from a keyboard.

Personally, I think someone just stole all the punctuation from a book, jumbled them up, and then tossed them around willy nilly as icons to see if we liked it. Sorry, that doesn't do it for me.

I don't think you understand what "icon" is. Can you fit this detailed picture of a rocket in a 10 by 10 pixel (or how much exactly?) image in a way that would be reliably readable on screen? I don't think so. Same goes for sniper bot image and even for hollow cross. Icons should be extremely simple.

Icons are 52 x 52.

Icons are 52 by 52, as Stuart said, have you never seen the comms icon? I could make a simplistic pixel art missile, and reticle. It doesn't have to by HD super curvy or anything, the shape just has to be easy to tell what it means.

I would not want t1 bot icon to be the size of comm icon.

Luckily enough for you, neither bot is T1.

I mean look what I can make with this few pixels

Once again, a bad case of reinventing the wheel.
It's not an excellent job at all, it's not better than previous icons, just different.

I don't know why or how uber has decided these shapes & icons, but they are really confusing, unclear and very far from standard that any RTS/4X/Boardgame player already knows :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_Military_Symbols_for_Land_Based_Systems

ie. Grounds units should be a square/rectangle. I don't know why so much space is wasted on the current shape.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_Military_Symbols_for_Land_Based_Systems#Battle_dimension

ie. Supcom icons are derived from these standards, and except or on two exceptions, nobody ever said anything against them.

A dome is and always was Anti Air. In any game or real-life, anything. No idea why it's a radar now. It doesn't even make sense symbol-wise.
I could have understand if it was for shields or whatever, but.. meh..

I mean, look at the signature of tatsujb, even if you don't know supcom, you can already say what is what more clearly than the current set of icons.

Pretty sure the game isn't rated for those kind of mature themes..

*sighs*

What's wrong with a rock guitar?

I'm pretty sure those are shears from minecraft.

Devil worship obviously...

I'm liking the new icons too, though I'm still getting used to them.

One question though - are there supposed to be 3 icons for metal extractors? I appear to have different icons for:

- metal extractor
- advanced metal extractor
- metal extractor which is upgraded to advanced

Don't remember that with the previous icon set and not sure whether they're supposed to be doing this or are bugged?

Alie

that's the whole PNG counting transparent pixel.

In reality a tank, for example, is 24x12


...i personally consider hat to be way to big.
in my icon pack, I stick to 11x11