Anchor Suggestion

agreed, but if their stationary they should be built in orbit by orbital fabricators otherwise you won't be able to place them where you want them.

Imagine a game where there was no terrain and there were only two units- the combat unit that flies around killing things, and the defensive unit that blocks it. That's orbital play in a nutshell.

The best solution is to not even acknowledge orbit as a combat layer in the first place. Its first and most important function is to make interplanetary battle viable. If that doesn't work then nothing else about the orbital layer matters.

Suppose a player in a losing situation loses. There's nothing wrong with that.

This discussion is moot if the orbital layer were used as I mentioned in this thread.
https://forums.uberent.com/threads/orbital-layer-should-be-tactical-intelligence-gathering.54380/

Now I concede that this is not the direction Uber has decided to go for the orbital layer but I still feel it would be the most appropriate and serve to clear some of the unit clutter that comes as ground, air, and orbital units overlap each other.

i think its fine really

perhaps the anchors have a fuel cell and can only move x amount of game units from launch keeping them from becoming exploited in any fashion. also if orbital units followed a move order off the launcher so as to fly to an area away from the anchor it wouldnt be an issue