Beta Build: 58678

Discussion in 'Support!' started by garat, December 18, 2013.

  1. cwarner7264

    cwarner7264 Moderator Alumni

    Messages:
    4,460
    Likes Received:
    5,390
    I haven't done the maths, but I think the new cost is probably going to be [cost of building] + [cost of missile].
  2. stormingkiwi

    stormingkiwi Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    1,355
    What IS the new cost?
  3. Raevn

    Raevn Moderator Alumni

    Messages:
    4,226
    Likes Received:
    4,324
    https://forums.uberent.com/threads/beta-build-58678.54860/#post-840264.
    @cwarner7264 is correct, the new cost is [old cost of building] + [cost of missile]

    Old Cost: 4500
    Missile Cost: 17280
    New Cost: 21780
  4. stormingkiwi

    stormingkiwi Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,266
    Likes Received:
    1,355
    Ah right. I didn't see your update earlier, you hadn't quite got that far.

    Wow. That's crap. It's still way better to ignore it and nuke the nuke.
    zweistein000 and Quitch like this.
  5. coreta

    coreta Member

    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    1
  6. cola_colin

    cola_colin Moderator Alumni

    Messages:
    12,074
    Likes Received:
    16,221
    I agree cheaper antinukes would be pretty okay I think as it a single antinuke by far cannot protect all your stuff anyway. So the attacker can just nuke something out of range of the anti.
    zweistein000 and cwarner7264 like this.
  7. drz1

    drz1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,257
    Likes Received:
    860
    What's this, in layman's terms, please?
  8. Raevn

    Raevn Moderator Alumni

    Messages:
    4,226
    Likes Received:
    4,324
    I have no idea :p
    drz1 likes this.
  9. drz1

    drz1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,257
    Likes Received:
    860
    Lol thanks :p
    shootall likes this.
  10. cptconundrum

    cptconundrum Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,186
    Likes Received:
    4,900
  11. carn1x

    carn1x Active Member

    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    156
    Lava planets aren't available for system auto-generation
  12. ZobiOneKenobi

    ZobiOneKenobi New Member

    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    1
    Area Build is really Uber-Awesome !
    Beautifull bases with perfect lines of wall everywhere :)
  13. Raevn

    Raevn Moderator Alumni

    Messages:
    4,226
    Likes Received:
    4,324
    That's because the serverside copy of the file hasn't been modified, so when the order is issued, the server uses it's own value of the spacing.
    stormingkiwi likes this.
  14. cptconundrum

    cptconundrum Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,186
    Likes Received:
    4,900
    But at least I can build a 10x10 block of walls now.:p
  15. Raevn

    Raevn Moderator Alumni

    Messages:
    4,226
    Likes Received:
    4,324
    It's curious that it does use the server value though; since it's just issuing commands, as long as the server checks that the command is valid and doesn't accept buildings placed in bad spots then I don't see why it can't use the client-side value for the spacing.
  16. LavaSnake

    LavaSnake Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,620
    Likes Received:
    691
    I must say, those new lava planets are awe inspiring. They just look so perfect.
    Quad on Lava 1.PNG Quad on Lava 3.PNG
    zweistein000 likes this.
  17. thetrophysystem

    thetrophysystem Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    2,874
    What? The increase in price simply adds the cost of missile and silo together. Unless you have an argument that an empty solo and the related micromanagement of the first missile are useful, how is it a mistake?

    Let me take my shot at what you are arguing. It is a mistake that it isn't cheaper, because of balance. And that is a consideration. It just isn't relevant to the current fix, and in fact there are no negatives to the current fix.

    If you want to argue balance, it makes the scouting time for antinuke smaller, and gives the antinuke a edge on the nuke by coming with one in the chaimber while the nuke comes empty.

    Also, i second the addition of area build density with mouse scroll. Negative is it blocks zooming, but one can just zoom before they issue area build commands.
  18. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    Id like to also add that I would love additional anti-nuke and nuke options to choose from.

    Please allow me a selection of flavours, and I'll tell you what tastes nice!
  19. cptconundrum

    cptconundrum Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,186
    Likes Received:
    4,900
    Does the nuke launcher come with an initial missile already finished too? If not, shouldn't it?
    stormingkiwi and Quitch like this.
  20. Quitch

    Quitch Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,884
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    Because they suck balls. They sucked balls before because it's more sensible to build your own nuke and attack theirs then it does to build a unit with no offensive capability which can defend only a fraction of your base. The real kick in the testecles is that the "free" missile isn't free at all, it's part of the cost and thus the build time!

Share This Page