1. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    @cdrkf >in before they totally come down on you like a pack of mad wolves. (I admire your courage, keep being you)
    squishypon3 and cdrkf like this.
  2. cdrkf

    cdrkf Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    4,793
    Haha, thankfully not much they can do to me other than made me mildly irritated lol.
    DalekDan, squishypon3 and tatsujb like this.
  3. MrTBSC

    MrTBSC Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,857
    Likes Received:
    1,823
    no it wouldn't, the opposite rather as it would limit the strategic options available to you ... it would enforce going t2 as those are stronger than t1 meaning t1 bot spam being far less effective do to missing numbers ... multiplanetplay would be less dynamic as you spread your forces thinner and thinner in order to defend larger terrain .. and this can be frustrating to some ...
  4. Remy561

    Remy561 Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,016
    Likes Received:
    641
    I don't think the unit cap should count for buildings, since they barely affect server performance. The game mostly slows down when one selects a large group of idle units and send them somewhere else, so it should just be a mobile unit cap ;)

    Next to unit cap, why not add a list of disabled units, so lobbies can choose to disable nukes and artillery stuff. I always used to switch off nukes back in the supcom days, I hated them. In PA I don't hate them though ;)
  5. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    I think you're confusing supply and unit cap there ;)

    understandable.
  6. theseeker2

    theseeker2 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    469
    Use Uber's server
    nignog
  7. ReddWolff

    ReddWolff Member

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    57
    Name calling is not nice and doesn't help with your argument.
    Last edited: January 27, 2015
  8. Dementiurge

    Dementiurge Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,094
    Likes Received:
    693
    I thought he was signing his name.
    theseeker2, tatsujb and ReddWolff like this.
  9. ReddWolff

    ReddWolff Member

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    57
    Thank you for the AI adjustable unit cap, I'm sure it will help a lot with late game slowdown. Especially with the save game option now in place that allow for much longer skirmish games. :)
    Last edited: February 28, 2015
  10. Sorian

    Sorian Official PA

    Messages:
    998
    Likes Received:
    3,844
    There was already a cap, I just added a way for people running custom servers to adjust it (or remove it). There were other changes added to PTE to help alleviate lag in large unit count games.
    tatsujb likes this.
  11. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,357
    I agree with you in essence.. But nignog? Thats like calling someone a silly head.. :p
  12. ReddWolff

    ReddWolff Member

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    57
    Yeah I had noticed that the game was running much smoother just lately. But thanks for the option to now play against a finite number of units. Much appreciated.
  13. ReddWolff

    ReddWolff Member

    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    57
    Silly head isn't nice either. ;)
  14. theseeker2

    theseeker2 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    469
    dummkopf

Share This Page