[WIP] A different take on Strategic Icons

Discussion in 'Work-In-Progress Mods' started by nanolathe, August 26, 2014.

  1. nanolathe

    nanolathe Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,839
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    Hello again. Today I have something a little different to show you; my completed (for mobile units) Strategic Icons. Thanks for all the feedback so far. I'll continue working on these as necessary and as new units are added (by either RCBM or Uber).

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG][​IMG]
    [​IMG]


    As usual, any comments and criticisms are welcome. If there's anything you think would make these better, please drop a comment below.
    Last edited: September 6, 2014
    Nicb1, emraldis, warrenkc and 7 others like this.
  2. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    They look alright.

    What are you doing for orbital?
  3. Raevn

    Raevn Moderator Alumni

    Messages:
    4,226
    Likes Received:
    4,324
    The inner OCD inside me is complaining that some icons are a front perspective of the unit, while others are top down.

    But I like the style.
    aevs likes this.
  4. nanolathe

    nanolathe Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,839
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    That's intentional. Tanks are more distinctive from a top-down perspective, while bots are most distinctive when viewed from the front. It creates a distinction between the two also, making them less likely to be confused at a glance.

    What's really important is; are they clearly identifiable as the unit they are supposed to represent?
    warrenkc and stuart98 like this.
  5. zx0

    zx0 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    295
    Likes Received:
    319
    They are easy to learn and identify, I like it. That would be nice to have some special trait for fabbers though like those plus sighs or maybe diagonal lines like they have on models.
    warrenkc likes this.
  6. nanolathe

    nanolathe Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,839
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    I'll definitely consider it. Some of the fabricator models (especially the Vehicle Fabricator) doesn't have a clean outline, making it a lot more difficult to identify at a glance.
  7. zweistein000

    zweistein000 Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,362
    Likes Received:
    727
    How about making the lathe of the fabbers always green?
  8. ace63

    ace63 Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,067
    Likes Received:
    826
    I like them.
    I always struggle with the default icons since they are too abstract and don't resemble their represented units whatsoever.
  9. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,356
    Wow, loving then Nano, easy to understand and see. I'm surprised I haven't seen complaints about them being "too complex." Great little aesthetic, I'd use a mod for the icons if you ended up completing the roster. :D
  10. optimi

    optimi Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    652
    Very, very nice. Though I wonder what they'd look like in large numbers.
  11. brianpurkiss

    brianpurkiss Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    7,438
    That's what I'm most interested in.

    Particularly large numbers of a mixed army.
  12. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    I think you may have a problem of expectations vs. reality there. Try to photoshop them onto each unit here:
    Untd.jpg
    rule of thumb with icons :

    smaller is better.

    other that that, yes shoot. I like them.
  13. liquius

    liquius Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    731
    Likes Received:
    482
    1. In that screenshot the bots are clipping into each other, that is not working as intended. Without that it would look considerably better.

    2. These icons are being made primarily for RCBM. In RCBM units are a lot less spammy.

    I am not dismissing your point, but there are mitigating factors.

    It's probably worth getting a screenshot to show what they look like ingame. That might happen tonight.
  14. nanolathe

    nanolathe Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,839
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    I'll work on another set of 4. I'll post them when I'm done.
    Any requests for something specific?
  15. optimi

    optimi Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    652
    Air units?
  16. nanolathe

    nanolathe Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,839
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    [​IMG]

    Pop quiz: What is it?

    ---

    Trick question. The answer is "Too big".
    :p
    Last edited: August 26, 2014
    stuart98, warrenkc and cwarner7264 like this.
  17. Fr33Lancer

    Fr33Lancer Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    595
    Likes Received:
    288
    T1 bomber !
    Cookie for me ? :p
    stuart98 and cwarner7264 like this.
  18. cwarner7264

    cwarner7264 Moderator Alumni

    Messages:
    4,460
    Likes Received:
    5,390
    Commander?
  19. nanolathe

    nanolathe Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,839
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    [​IMG]
    I think this version is much better.
    Last edited: August 26, 2014
    warrenkc, zweistein000 and Fr33Lancer like this.
  20. optimi

    optimi Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    572
    Likes Received:
    652
    Very neat. I look forward to seeing more!
    warrenkc likes this.

Share This Page