Why do planes land?

Discussion in 'Balance Discussions' started by Teod, March 24, 2014.

  1. Teod

    Teod Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    483
    Likes Received:
    268
    Why are they landing after reaching the destination? They don't seem to have fuel to conserve. All it makes is slows them down, divides the group (when some of them land and some don't) and makes them vulnerable to ground attacks. Just hovering or even flying tiny circles would make more sense.

    I'm not sure if it should be here on in general discussion...
    vyolin, stormingkiwi and stuart98 like this.
  2. Clopse

    Clopse Post Master General

    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    2,865
    Not sure why but it can be annoying if your fighter can't kill their scout sitting outside your base.
  3. superouman

    superouman Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,007
    Likes Received:
    1,139
    It's very useful, especially to prevent your air fabbers, bombers and gunship from being sniped by a peregrine run-by. (When landing in your own base)
  4. stuart98

    stuart98 Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,009
    Likes Received:
    3,888
    Then they should have a simple land button. It's too clunky right now.
  5. Clopse

    Clopse Post Master General

    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    2,865
    Do gunships land? Have never seen or managed to get a gunship/ pelican to land
  6. Quitch

    Quitch Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,856
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    Landing is fine so long as those units cannot continue to shoot when landed, otherwise it's really just massive cheese. I saw people suggest that air units can shoot landed units, but then what's the point of anything landing?
    brianpurkiss likes this.
  7. superouman

    superouman Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,007
    Likes Received:
    1,139
    Yeah, not sure about the gunship actually.
  8. stuart98

    stuart98 Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,009
    Likes Received:
    3,888
    Neither can.

    It mainly makes assaults using air hard to coordinate. They shouldn't be hard to initiate, they should be impossible to let work.
  9. brianpurkiss

    brianpurkiss Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    7,438
    I really hate it when my aircraft land when they shouldn't and get shot by enemy ground units.
  10. Geers

    Geers Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,946
    Likes Received:
    6,820
    They get tired.
    cola_colin and stormingkiwi like this.
  11. thetrophysystem

    thetrophysystem Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    2,874
    I wonder if it would be best to just keep them in the air layer. Actually, it looks like a lot of work was done to make them land in the first place is the real shame of it, always a shame when work is spent in development and comes to this kind of thing.

    Generally, it is more consistent if they were to hover, maybe do a realistic "wide hover" where they sway in all sorts of directions, maybe make some of them actually fly small circles like bees when they idle just for activity, but I never was a fan of them landing and being shot by ground, or them landing and still being able to shoot air, or them landing and being hard to find or slow to respond.
    vyolin likes this.
  12. websterx01

    websterx01 Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,682
    Likes Received:
    1,063
    Yes. Toggle landing on and of so that we can land of we want, and refuse then landing if we don't want then to.
  13. darkshadow4242

    darkshadow4242 New Member

    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    7
    Landing stops them from being targeted by air supremacy fighters and appear like ground units on radar. Both can be useful in the right situation.

    If you want them to stay in the air give them a small area patrol order.
  14. cola_colin

    cola_colin Moderator Alumni

    Messages:
    12,074
    Likes Received:
    16,221
    I think air should just stay in the air. Maybe model them a bit different to make it clear they are based on some sort of super high tech gravitational control system and not on wings.
    vyolin and brianpurkiss like this.
  15. brianpurkiss

    brianpurkiss Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    7,438
    Agreed. I wish they wouldn't land.
  16. vyolin

    vyolin Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    631
    Likes Received:
    479
    Like in the case of the '5 SXX instant win' scenario it is unreasonable to expect everyone to use the patrol order outside of its original purpose just to prevent being screwed over by someone exploiting the game's idiosyncrasies.
    Make the default behaviour work for the player, not against him. Macro game and all that.
  17. superouman

    superouman Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,007
    Likes Received:
    1,139
    The landing feature is too useful to be removed. I don't want my bombers/gunships/fabbers to be cleaned up by a run-by of fighters.
  18. Teod

    Teod Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    483
    Likes Received:
    268
    It would be nice to have it toggleable. But the default should be "stay in the air".
  19. cola_colin

    cola_colin Moderator Alumni

    Messages:
    12,074
    Likes Received:
    16,221
    I am pretty sure I lost far more stuff to it when my fighters decided to land in the middle of a battlefield
    Clopse, igncom1 and Quitch like this.
  20. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    Considering I can't have idle tanks take off when not fighting.

    Im not really much of a fan of the landing.
    vyolin likes this.

Share This Page