Uber, why do nuclear missiles cost twice as much as halleys?

Discussion in 'Balance Discussions' started by tehtrekd, September 7, 2014.

  1. tehtrekd

    tehtrekd Post Master General

    Messages:
    2,996
    Likes Received:
    2,772
    UBER, WHY DO NUCLEAR MISSILES COST TWICE AS MUCH AS HALLEYS?
    0.png
    ...
    UBER, WHY DO NUCLEAR MISSILES COST TWICE AS MUCH AS HALLEYS!??!!
    *ah-hem*

    Yeah I'm slightly miffed about this. I mean, just think about how baffling this is.

    You need to destroy a minimum of 100,800 metal just for a nuclear missile to be worth it from an investment standpoint, in a relatively small blast radius.
    Most planet smashes don't even destroy that much, but they make up for it by being very good commander destroyers.

    It takes two nuclear missiles (187,200 metal minimum!!) to kill a commander. Most halley-able moons only take three halleys (120,000 metal)
    I really don't think Uber thought through the pricing of nukes :/ they're just not powerful enough to justify the price. This is what a MIRV nuke should cost, not a regular IPBM.
  2. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,356
    Agreed, they're absolutely worthless right now. Overnerfed to the max. :/
  3. wondible

    wondible Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,315
    Likes Received:
    2,089
    This is partially incorrect; the missile cost is 50,000 (and anti-nuke ammo is 6,750); the UI hacks didn't get updated.
    websterx01 and killerkiwijuice like this.
  4. brianpurkiss

    brianpurkiss Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    7,438
    the missile cost has been slowly creeping down over time, but yeah. It needs to be brought way down
  5. killerkiwijuice

    killerkiwijuice Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,879
    Likes Received:
    3,597
    It's 50K for the missile. Which is still too much imo.

    I liked it in beta when it was 28k. It added spice to the games and was even an extra strategy to rush a nuke.
  6. nixtempestas

    nixtempestas Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    746
    I'm good with cheap nukes so long as anti-nukes are balanced for that cost.

    back in beta, they weren't. at all.
  7. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    What if the interplanetary nuke and normal nuke were two different missiles?...........na, it could never work.
  8. nixtempestas

    nixtempestas Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    746
    this was originally the idea I think but uber decided not to bother with that (they talked about it a bit in the livestream)

    I agree it would be nice though. Should be moddable.
  9. thetrophysystem

    thetrophysystem Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    2,874
    Nukes come from a factory. The benefit in that is build efficiency, mass production, not limiting to a vital resource (spends an entire planet of a particular detail type.

    You can build one halley with tons of fabbers fast, that is no lie. It takes less fabbers to assist several factories of nukes, and fire one periodically. Periodic nukes will destroy a larger base than a meteor impact, because you can spread it across the surface.
  10. nixtempestas

    nixtempestas Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    746
    also: "build_metal_cost":32400
  11. philoscience

    philoscience Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,022
    Likes Received:
    1,048
    I guess Uber felt the nuke wars of beta were not good gameplay. They did get a bit excessive but I miss when we saw strategic defensive nukes, nuke hail marys, etc. I don't want to go back to nuke wars but I think they need to come down a good deal more. Also on the subject of over-nerfs: I really miss the days of effective T2 tank air drops. Those were hard to pull off and added a lot of excitement to matches.
  12. thetrophysystem

    thetrophysystem Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    2,874
    Dude, if you drop a vanguard onto a commander, he is still dead.

    The problem, is the cost of rushing him with enough that he doesn't shoot it down (because he has AA now).

    In that reguard, make the pelican able to survive a shot of commander AA. Glad they nerfed it's ROF btw.
  13. philoscience

    philoscience Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,022
    Likes Received:
    1,048
    True. Although I'm actually thinking more about the days of dropping a vanguard on a T2 power strip and tanking the enemies economy. Vanguards have been nerfed a lot and the only time I saw someone go for a drop it was totally ganked by enemy ground forces. We used to see whole tournies revolving around them but I can't think of a recent casted match where a drop mattered.
  14. thetrophysystem

    thetrophysystem Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    2,874
    Whole tournies revolving around stuff just pisses me off.

    I see them now, they are usually "classic" moves, and that adds all that much more value to them.

    Next time I play, if I t2 veh, I will consider t2 air as well just to try to execute this classic maneuver.
  15. philoscience

    philoscience Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,022
    Likes Received:
    1,048
    I think you misunderstand what i'm trying to say. I didn't mean that tournaments should revolve around them, just that they are very rare now. I think it was more exciting when they were viable enough to appear at least on semi-regular basis. Probably the transport or vangaurd just needs to be buffed slightly.
  16. thetrophysystem

    thetrophysystem Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    2,874
    Idk, I suggested pelican survival (health buff), because of the cost including tech investment of the two.

    But here is an interesting buff: Get rid of the double-factory investment requirement.

    That's right, make pelicans t2 vehicle factory buildable. Like, put that in your pipe and smoke it, swig it around, and just taste it for a moment. That is the perfect t2 vehicle unit.
  17. mered4

    mered4 Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,083
    Likes Received:
    3,149
    The current cost of Nukes (50000) is actually reasonable, in my opinion. I think the nuke launcher needs to be dropped to 10k, but that's just me wanting for an easy calculation for Superweapon cost balanced.

Share This Page