Should Pelicans return to T1?

Discussion in 'Balance Discussions' started by Quitch, November 8, 2014.

  1. Quitch

    Quitch Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,853
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    There were two major issues with Pelicans at T1 (only one in my mind, but let's roll with two):

    1. They eliminated the delay in expansion time, you could roll the more efficient land fabbers around like they were air fabbers.

    2. The one I believe was the major issue: Commander rushing. As shown by Matiz and Clopse this was virtually indefensible, relying on a lucky fighter to stop.

    Neither of these seem to be major factors any more. Expansion is far more dangerous due to faster units at T1 making it much riskier, and more importantly Commander rushing would no longer work. The tactic relied on eliminating your opponent's energy to neutralise their Ubercannon, except the Commander is its own energy production now so you cannot neutralise his cannon.

    These changes to the game make me wonder whether it's worth examining bringing the Pelican back to T1.
    komandorcliff and elodea like this.
  2. stuart98

    stuart98 Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,009
    Likes Received:
    3,888
  3. cptconundrum

    cptconundrum Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,186
    Likes Received:
    4,900
    Maybe first we can try making it possible to build t2. ;)
    cwarner7264 and elodea like this.
  4. lizard771

    lizard771 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    314
    Move to T1, make 'em a bit slower.
    Remember the Atlas? It wasn't very fast too, but T1.
    stuart98 likes this.
  5. stuart98

    stuart98 Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,009
    Likes Received:
    3,888
    Basically how both RCBM and Statera do their T1 transports.
    zweistein000 likes this.
  6. mered4

    mered4 Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,083
    Likes Received:
    3,149
    I think this should be the thing on the bottom of anyone's FIX THIS STUFF list. It causes more balance problems instead of encouraging different play, imho.

    Mostly because their mechanics are really weird. Super-fast pick-up and drop-off coupled with the speed of a Fighter? I mean, what?
    igncom1 likes this.
  7. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    We need all of the UI transport options too, before we can even begin arguing about multi-unit transports and boat transports.
    mered4 likes this.
  8. elodea

    elodea Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,694
    Likes Received:
    3,040
    yes t1 pelicans would be good for gameplay and solve some mobility issues that tank play has. Balance is easy, and if not, i'm sure mered will be able to balance it for you in 2 minutes tops. He's really good at adapting to new things and figuring out how they work so very quickly.

    Using transport ui is easy enough. Select units, shift use on each pelican and they will all get picked up.
    rivii, stuart98 and Clopse like this.
  9. Clopse

    Clopse Post Master General

    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    2,865
    The main problem was the insta drop. I'm not sure if it still is an issue but was so fast you could see fighters and drop your units before their fighters got within range. I think It's a great idea once we get some landing animation. Will make games really interesting.
    burntcustard likes this.
  10. mot9001

    mot9001 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    833
    Likes Received:
    650
    I would love to see a crash animation aswell. It could also be used for astreus. If your unit is transported and the transport dies then the transported unit will crashland, take damage and potentially explode because of that. It was amazing in the game Zero-K i think it will work out in PA too because it removes the ridiculous commander kills with 1 or 2 heatseekers when its being picked up, but it doesn't entirely remove risk since the crash will do damage too. Also, its just amazing to see a robot crashland and then continue the fight like it didn't even happen.
  11. philoscience

    philoscience Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,022
    Likes Received:
    1,048
    I believe the should be T1. It is hard enough to get to T2 now that I don't think it's a big issue. And commanders are a lot weaker than they used to be. If the commander pelican rush returns as a problem I have no issue with an edge case fix that says coms cannot be loaded on pelicans. Astreasus provided a more easily balanced com transport already.
  12. burntcustard

    burntcustard Post Master General

    Messages:
    699
    Likes Received:
    1,312
    I think they should be T1. I made a little mod that does this ages ago.

    I would like to see the area commands for loading and unloading be improved. One way this could be done would be to highlight individual units inside the load area command to show which ones will actually be picked up.
    philoscience likes this.
  13. philoscience

    philoscience Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,022
    Likes Received:
    1,048
    There are so many little UI tweaks like this that could make PA 100x better. I assume we don't have mod hooks for any of this?
  14. philoscience

    philoscience Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,022
    Likes Received:
    1,048
    Sometimes I worry we wont be seeing any new art or animations as it seems most of the art team was sent to HR and presumably let go? I suppose they retained some people for making the commanders but given the speed of that and the large number still to be made, those people won't be making any new assets anytime soon. This was part of my motivation for the failed push to allowed modded commander skins as new 'units' but lets not revisit that fiasco.
  15. cola_colin

    cola_colin Moderator Alumni

    Messages:
    12,074
    Likes Received:
    16,221
    It would be fun if they can be t1, but I think other issues with the balance should be fixed first. Making t1 air transports that "work" isn't easy I think, so it is probably better not to make them before the rest of the balance is in a better state.
  16. philoscience

    philoscience Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,022
    Likes Received:
    1,048
    I'm torn on this. On the one hand, it is true that they will destabilize balance a lot. For example for now most people only build 'forward facing' fortifications, but widespread t1 transports would mean you could easily drop behind walls if there is no AA protection. At the same time, why rebalance everything once these go in, if they are to go in at all?
    cola_colin likes this.
  17. thetrophysystem

    thetrophysystem Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    2,874
    1) Dox have AA, dox easily early game swarm everywhere. Dox definitely prevent pelicans from dropping commanders near other commanders.

    2) Dox and t1 buffs also make it harder to expand even with quick-speed.

    In light of that, something can happen to Pelicans:

    1) Pelicans can become t1.
    2) Pelicans can become t2 vehicle. That way, they are included with their "target audience".
    3) Pelicans remain t2 air, and are given a mild health buff (50) and/or a radar-invisibility, both possibly returning their snipe-potential when combined with vanguards or such.
  18. Clopse

    Clopse Post Master General

    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    2,865
    I think lazer turret will have to be able to target air units. The slow moving ones at least: Drop an inferno at the back of a turret and the turret is dead before it turns. Expensive enough to defend areas as it is.
  19. towerbabbel

    towerbabbel Active Member

    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    106
    Lets us drop tank behind point defense lines. Makes defenses even weaker. Exactly what the balance needs.
  20. LmalukoBR

    LmalukoBR Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    327
    Likes Received:
    278
    I think we need to see how the balance gets moving forward, then see how it will fit in. I like the idea of it being T1 but i think it's best to see how the balance gets before making changes and then having to undo them.

Share This Page