Orbital Fabbers: Descend to build Teleporters?

Discussion in 'Balance Discussions' started by LeadfootSlim, October 15, 2014.

  1. LeadfootSlim

    LeadfootSlim Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    576
    Likes Received:
    349
    It's always struck me as tremendously odd that orbital fabbers can spray their nanolathes down from way up in orbit... there have been some complaints, as well, that this (plus the rapid build-speed of teleporters) makes invasions too easy.

    For the sake of balance, what if Orbital fabbers had to descend (much as the Astreus does) to make Teleporters, thereby becoming vulnerable to AA fire? You can already clear ground by building Anchors to bombard a clear space, after all. The only weirdness is having a second sat that can go up and down willy-nilly.

    If all we need is a visually sensible tweak, then a descending pole-arm like the one used on Gas Giant collectors could work too. Not sure how that'd be fired upon by AA, though, if at all. What say you?
    DalekDan likes this.
  2. Obscillesk

    Obscillesk Active Member

    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    87
    I get what you mean, it is strangely inconsistent. Maybe have them drop down and hover on jets while building then thrust back up to orbit?
  3. exterminans

    exterminans Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,881
    Likes Received:
    986
    Either descend to air layer - or what makes more sense: Use the egg mechanic for teleporter "drops". Build it in orbital layer and only have the portal descend.

    Either way: No inter layer construction.
    pieman2906 and igncom1 like this.
  4. thetrophysystem

    thetrophysystem Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    2,874
    The surface-t0-0rbit nanolathing is much more problematic. Can really be removed at this stage...
    igncom1 likes this.
  5. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    Id much prefer having them be incapable of building the teleporter at all.
  6. Geers

    Geers Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,946
    Likes Received:
    6,820
    That would make it too easy to turtle on a planet.
  7. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    Only because orbital is broken as hell.

    Do not keep silly and stupid features because others are broken.


    You are better then that, come on.
  8. Geers

    Geers Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,946
    Likes Received:
    6,820
    If I'm due for surgery to fix my problem I'd rather keep the bandage on while I wait.
    killerkiwijuice likes this.
  9. philoscience

    philoscience Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,022
    Likes Received:
    1,048
    If you got rid of orbital fabs building teles from space, or building teles at all, orbital gameplay would completely collapse again. It's absolutely essential to have an easy way to get teleporters down on a planet. Barring some major overhaul of orbital (which is clearly not going to happen), this is here to stay, realism aside.
    Geers likes this.

Share This Page