Buildable Metal Planets....

Discussion in 'Planetary Annihilation General Discussion' started by bengeocth, September 1, 2014.

  1. bengeocth

    bengeocth Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    657
    So I noticed something about Metal Planets.. namely how they are metal... and one of the resources in the game is metal... and....


    I think you see where I am going with this! Get your orbital fabber out, cuz we're going to space to make our own metal planet!

    You could drag to adjust the size, which would determine its metal worth, and the generated planet would of course have no mex points.

    Once you have established the planet, you must colonize it, and maybe even fight for it, if your enemy catches on quick enough. Build your catalysts... and... ZZZAP!

    We already destroy planets, and the whole point of the game is to create and destroy.

    No time to stop playing God now. Let's do it!

    Besides, these Commanders will stop at nothing to eliminate their enemy.

    Please post your opinions below.
    Last edited: September 1, 2014
    kjotak109 likes this.
  2. BulletMagnet

    BulletMagnet Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,263
    Likes Received:
    591
    You're going to hollow out other planets to build one.

    Seems like a pointless idea because it's going to be so expensive that you're better off just building Halleys on the planets you're mining.
  3. bengeocth

    bengeocth Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    657
    What if you don't have crashable planets?

    and about the hollowing....

    "We're not going for realistic, we're going for Awesome." -Brad Nicholson
    Metal is infinite in this game sooooooo... lets do it
  4. kjotak109

    kjotak109 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    606
    Likes Received:
    303
    I don't know if building metal planets with an orbital fabricator is feasible given current rendering technology and engine limits.

    But if this is possible, then yes, I would like to build my own planets and zap the enemy.
  5. BulletMagnet

    BulletMagnet Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,263
    Likes Received:
    591
    Then I'd use a moon. If there's no moons left, and bombing the pants out of the enemy isn't an option, then I'd go build the smallest planet possible (after all, why build an expensive planet when a cheap one has the same laser).

    And since we're not going for realistic, we should be able to mine metal out of our own metal planets.
    bengeocth likes this.
  6. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,357
    Mining mrtal from your planet is the realistic bit. And from a gameplay standpoint it'd be bad. Whem they say "we're not shootimg for realism, we're shooting fore awesome: they meant "we're shootimg for awesome from a gameplay stand point. Same reaskm there are ml experimentals.

    Also sorry for typos, computer's broken so im using a tablet with huge yet tiny keys and no auto correct, its reallh hard to hit the right keys.
  7. cptconundrum

    cptconundrum Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,186
    Likes Received:
    4,900
    I think the idea is that a galactic-scale civilization was able to create some of these only after a massive engineering project that would have taken a lot of time and resources even for people as powerful as them. The few remaining commanders in the galaxy probably can't even begin to consider building one. Even if they could, would they? They seem programmed to focus just on destroying.
    drewsuser likes this.
  8. leighzer

    leighzer Member

    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    24
    This would simply be awesome.
  9. temeter

    temeter Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    305
    I think it's a very viable idea. Maybe not metal planets itself, but planetoids or some sort of artificial 'asteroid' would be pretty cool. Would have to be memory friendly, though. Otherwise a stalemate could turn into last RAM-chip standing.:rolleyes:
  10. Geers

    Geers Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,946
    Likes Received:
    6,820
    But Annihilasers are not human technology. It's from an ancient alien race, the commanders would have no knowledge on how to build one.
  11. thetrophysystem

    thetrophysystem Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    2,874
    Gameplay wise, would take too much resources and time than a normal game would allow.

    I mean, it would take 30 minutes to get dug into this strategy, by which you could have double-nuked a commander. To actually implement the planet and THEN laser with it, you could have carpet-bombed the enemy planet with nukes.
    bengeocth and BulletMagnet like this.
  12. bengeocth

    bengeocth Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    657
    Well, let's keep a basic sense of logic. I mean, based off of that, what robot army would construct a metal planet, while at war, to be able to provide its own resources? I mean, that's like having a tank that produces metal. It just can't be done.
  13. bengeocth

    bengeocth Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    657
    But still

    awesome
  14. bengeocth

    bengeocth Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    657
    What if the enemy planet is out of nuke range
    kjotak109 likes this.
  15. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    A lot of things like propulsing planets into another are rather over the top pointless ways to achieve things.

    this is a great idea. I don't see why building yourself a death star should be a no in the game.
  16. verybad

    verybad Active Member

    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    76
    I do kind of like the idea of being able to build one of these from scratch.

    However, I think it should take so much mass and energy that you can ONLY build them in orbit of Gas Planets. (gives them another purpose) maybe a few million mass and who knows how much energy. Just ginormous amounts.

    Also, how about different size Metal planets, the bigger ones can fire more often?
  17. bengeocth

    bengeocth Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    657
    Aha! I was looking for a reason to build larger ones other than being able to set up more on them. And the gas giant idea is decent, but I personally wouldn't implement it. However, I wouldn't mind if it were implemented. Stay classy man
  18. verybad

    verybad Active Member

    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    76
    Maybe be able to build "sub-metal planets" That are only a portion at first and are only useful for building stuff on, then as you complete more sections, it gains the Annhlaser, and as you build ever more stuff, it can fire more often?
    bengeocth likes this.
  19. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,357
    Nukes can go anywhere in a system :p
  20. bengeocth

    bengeocth Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,285
    Likes Received:
    657
    good to know

Share This Page