UBER, please allow planet tilt in the system editor

It would allow for more variety in creating a system.

what does it change?

well obviously if this thread : https://forums.uberent.com/threads/lets-face-it-nobody-likes-orbital-arriving-pinpoint.64128/ becomes a reality the it can become of strategic value when creating a map.

For example : A planet that has a maximal inclination would be a fort against orbital attacks.

and then of course there's the aesthetic aspect which isn't negligible at all.

I was thinking about this last night. I would like to be able to do this but not so much for the reason referred in your other post. I also feel like this would cause more complications than it's worth so I can wait if they ever decide on this.

why?

I mean, shi t, the metal planet rotates LIVE, complete with base, units and orbital, to shoot another planet. surely is just a stat like any other in the game.

I don't see the point, other than aesthetics, since I disagree with you, but, whatever.

+1

I want it so that my incidental collisions can chop off the part of the planet I want. e.g: ripping off the north pole of a metal planet.

How about seeing metal deposits while in the system editor??

Metal deposits change based on how many players are in the game now so that wouldn't work well. (Although I would like that too)

Love dat signiture

I thought it was part of the post to emphasize the comment...

I emphasize burning phoenix team with every one of my comments

To add to that, why not make the orbits more 3d? Currently orbits are on a flat plane

ohhhh that is a gooooooood one.
and as a matter of fact it's come up before :
https://forums.uberent.com/threads/tilted-planetary-orbits.54779/

for some weird reason people thought it would mess with their game even though it would be constrained to the the system editor systems.

Anyways it seems like it's about time this be brought up again according to @garat's coment so I'm glad you mention it.

This is literally a feature, that depends on a wild arse change to another thing.

That being said, I don't support the wild arse change, so I don't support the feature either.

Except in the distant future. Because planets that orbit on it's poles and spin as well, are visually gorgeous. I miss the few I saw from Ur Quan Masters, ones completely 80-90 degree tilts.

I don't get exactly what you mean?

I'm saying have a slider in the system editor is all. in never said to change anything about the default random systems.

(which would thusly stay the same)

I support for asphetic reasons alone.

I support for aestetic reasons.

But please. For the love of bacon. Don't make orbital-entry tied to equator, planetary tilt, or facing of the sun...

Agree for asthethic reasons.
Clear no to effect on orbital approach.

Do you mean bacon or BACON?

The problem with good ideas is that you don't need to discuss them for five pages, so they fall off the front page.

different thread.