Would you like this Tourney, and would you play in it?

I would play this.

... i don´t quite understand ...

the G1 - 1st, 3rd - 4th, 2nd part ..

otherwise it´s a winner/loser bracket type tourney like it has been used in the starcraft 2 toournaments?

how long does a match go? and how the final/final with player from losers?
will there be best of 5 or best of 7 or just generaly best of 3?

This sounds an awful lot like:

https://forums.uberent.com/threads/know-your-foe-do-si-do-tournament-21st-28th-june.60650/

... ok ... i am clearly too dumb to understand this well :/ ...

I think the first of ffa one should play the last of ffa 2. Then the 2th of ffa one plays the 3th of ffa 2. If you have 2 single brackets with winners and losers, you will have more chance of making it to the finals if you're in the "loser's bracket".

I guess the hardcore players can redeem themselves in the elim rounds

So there is no actual benefit for doing well in the FFA?

Of course FFA:s can be pretty random or unfair, but statistically stronger players are still more likely to win. So the green bracket would be stronger in theory. Which means you should actually lose to improve your chances. Except that everyone else may think the same way (if their pride allows losing, that is...)

If there is some particularly dangerous opponent in your FFA, you might want to play yourself to the other bracket in various ways... Killing him first and winning would work of course. Or if you want to be more tricky, making sure he gets good position and then dying first.

Well, I'm not saying it's good or bad, and I don't know whether anyone would think too hard about it. It's maybe just a bit odd to have a tournament game where your best move just might be instant self-destruct.

Standard seeding practice is that the strongest player is matched with the weakest player, and the second strongest with the second weakest, etc. The idea being that the strongest players battle in the final as that's where the ultimate battle should happen.

Are your sure your pastats enabling skills are uptodate?

Would i be banned from exodus if i only showed up to the FFA part?

+1

No, but not capitalizing your "i"s will.

Would anyone be interested each round having a number of upto 10 player FFA's in a swiss style tournament.
To crown the king of the FFA.

That could be fun How would you rank it? Like a race giving difference points to 'placing' (i.e. winner- last man standing- gets 10 points, second gets 5 and 1 point for 3rd or something, most points wins overall?)...?

@wpmarshall nice idea, although I don't really understand what the purpose is of the initial FFA? It sorts players into 2 brackets but as both brackets are equal, it doesn't appear to have any specific benefit?

I'd argue you'd be better to make the FFA be an early 'knock out' round- where the first and second place player go through to the 1 v 1 tourney while 3rd and 4th are 'relegated' (a bit like the group stage in international football)?