Let's discuss: radar jammers [with poll]

Discussion in 'Planetary Annihilation General Discussion' started by LmalukoBR, November 24, 2014.

?

Should there be radar jamming and how should it be done?

  1. No, I being the all seing eye of Sauron.

    10.7%
  2. Yes, and i would like the jammer to just make the blips invisible

    53.6%
  3. Yes, I would like the jammer to create a area of interference but that area should apear on radar

    46.4%
  4. It should consume energy.

    82.1%
  5. It should be static

    64.3%
  6. It should e mobile

    46.4%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. LmalukoBR

    LmalukoBR Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    327
    Likes Received:
    278
    So i've been thinking after i read a post asking for a reduction on the rage of radar cause it diminishes the need for active intelligence gathering (scouting). And i must agree, there should be a way to hide your base and troop movements from radar.
    Now i think there are 2 ways to do radar jamming:
    One way the jammer hides all the information from the radar (system similar to stealth that hides signatures).
    In the other the radar jammr creates a interference, you can see that a area that is being jammed but can't get blips from that area (similar to the strategy to launch aluminum strips used to block radar in WW2).

    Also do you think it should need energy to operate, and should there be a mobile form, should it be T2 or T1?

    Discuss away my people!
    emraldis likes this.
  2. MrTBSC

    MrTBSC Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,857
    Likes Received:
    1,823
    mod first ... see if its worth or eventualy too powerfull with the scale
    generaly i wouldnt mind stealth nor radarjamming .. only cloaking shouldnt be in ...
  3. cdrkf

    cdrkf Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    4,793
    I think the concept of having it create an obvious 'black out zone' on radar is a clever one.

    It means you can mask off a sensitive area from radar (to prevent radar targeting by long range weapons for example) *however* it also clearly shows there is *something there* drawing attention to it.

    This also adds the juicy proposition of some cat a mouse shenanigans- you could randomly build radar jammers in totally unoccupied locations to draw the attention of your opponents. Want to scare them silly- build jammers over the control nodes on a metal planet for kicks :D
  4. eratosthenes

    eratosthenes Active Member

    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    181
    Mobile unit that simply erases radar blips with a short range. The unit can anchor itself into the ground, extend a large dish, and create a larger radar static zone that is visible on radar.
  5. emraldis

    emraldis Post Master General

    Messages:
    2,641
    Likes Received:
    1,843
    First idea is good, but second part is a bit to micro-y, I think just a structure would be better, and would be used much more often.
  6. MrTBSC

    MrTBSC Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,857
    Likes Received:
    1,823
    lets please not have active abilities for single units in a macrogame

    i am still waiting for a launch nuke button in the default ui
  7. eratosthenes

    eratosthenes Active Member

    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    181
    I guess it would be more in the spirit of this game to either have just the unit or the unit plus a structure. I just personally really enjoy unit transformations a la the Tick Tank from C&C.
  8. pieman2906

    pieman2906 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    517
    Likes Received:
    382
    Yeah, but to make proper use of transformable units takes a lot more immediate attention and babysitting than a macro game like PA can afford to have.
  9. eratosthenes

    eratosthenes Active Member

    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    181
    I find it pretty ironic that the meta in this "macrogame"leads to people microing dox in literally every single same (unless you want to lose). Until doxs are nerfed or whatever, all the "this is too much micro" arguments fly out the window because the early-mid game relies really heavily on the ability of the player to micro engagements btw groups of doxes.

    That being said, I totally agree. :p
  10. emraldis

    emraldis Post Master General

    Messages:
    2,641
    Likes Received:
    1,843
    that's why I play the PTE.
    squishypon3 likes this.
  11. eratosthenes

    eratosthenes Active Member

    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    181
    I haven't played in a week or two and I haven't looked over the PTE build. Was it rebalanced or something?
  12. emraldis

    emraldis Post Master General

    Messages:
    2,641
    Likes Received:
    1,843
    Ooooh yeah. Games are actually fun now.
  13. exterminans

    exterminans Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,881
    Likes Received:
    986
    Eh, where is the "long range radar system should only reveal large structures and T2 units by default"-option?

    Active stealth systems are pretty bad, they always come with that frustrating "But did I look, there was no base over there!" feeling attached. Certain stuff like factories, nukes and other super weapons must just be plain impossible too hide.

    And even for mobile units, it's not as simple as just hiding the blips. Hiding units while they are advancing? Fun for both sides. Hiding units when they are retreating? NOT FUN, just cheesy. Trying to hide units which you already have discovered is a bad move which is very likely to annoy the hell out of your opponent, and not in the good way, a certain grace period after leaving vision before the unit becomes untrackable is a must have. Plus certain actions like weapon fire must also break stealth properties.

    Oh, and the "area stealth field idea"? Yeah, forget about that. Like I said, the ability of remaining stealth is something which must not be applicable to all unit types, for certain units - including stuff like the long range T2 units - stealth would be fatal for balancing. If any stealth properties, then ONLY on a per unit base. Not necessarily with energy cost attached, but that "I already know where you are, you can no longer hide" exception is vital.

Share This Page