AnnihiLaser™ should caclulate collision

Discussion in 'Planetary Annihilation General Discussion' started by tatsujb, August 29, 2014.

?

collateral lasor damage

  1. yes

    88.3%
  2. no

    11.7%
  1. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,356
    I didn't want to say anything, but...

    It's spelled "collision"...
    xankar and xSkitz like this.
  2. elonshadow

    elonshadow Active Member

    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    231
    Took the words right of my mouth.
  3. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    Pffft! Don't you think I know that !?! /s

    .....:oops:
  4. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    plz plz plz uber :>
  5. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    ALSO Gaz giants and suns should block your shots entirely.
    Schulti likes this.
  6. thetbc

    thetbc Member

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    23
    Gas giants should explode in a ball of fire which vaporizes some of the nearby planets in their orbit
  7. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    space is not filled with air. you can't "combust" a planet simply because you gave it a "spark", If that where the case we'd have two suns since billions of years ago.

    other than that, I just feel Gaz giants are way too ........gigantic for metal planets to be able to take out.

    Also with the current OPness of metal planets, I suggest it would provide a deeper mechanic as you could "miss shots" if firing at the wrong time or also allow you to make interesting maps where certain planets are "immune" to metal planets simply because they have the exact same orbit as it, simply half of a cycle ahead and both are orbiting the sun or a gaz giant.
    Last edited: September 17, 2014
    xankar and corteks like this.
  8. thetbc

    thetbc Member

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    23
    "consist mostly of water, methane, and ammonia", so no oxygen or combustible gas on Neptune right?
  9. thetbc

    thetbc Member

    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    23
    Okay maybe my science was a little iffy but maybe it could burn up its atmosphere and destroy all of the jigs
  10. Nothinglessness

    Nothinglessness Member

    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    26
    Yeah, if they ever make it so there are multiple coordinates a planet can orbit, I don't think this would really be a thing
  11. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    Look I'm not saying I'm knowledgable on this but I'm pretty damn sure the core's (wich is directly in contact with the gaz) is hot enough, so if there's anything to combust on Neptune it would have burned decades ago.

    most gases arn't combustible.
  12. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
  13. maxcomander

    maxcomander Active Member

    Messages:
    328
    Likes Received:
    129
    Consider it bumped mate:) must have missed this one first time around.
  14. LeadfootSlim

    LeadfootSlim Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    576
    Likes Received:
    349
    I'm all for the sun blocking shots. Gas giants blocking /soaking shots and dealing nuke-like damage to the area of impact wouldn't hurt either, so that you could theoretically use a metal planet to scorch units off a gas giant. Leaving some roiling storms where the beam hit would also be interesting.

    As I mentioned in a different thread about Halleys, allowing room for mistakes means that some really cool stuff can happen.
  15. maxcomander

    maxcomander Active Member

    Messages:
    328
    Likes Received:
    129
    Ya I agree totally, I think it just adds a fun element and also adds an element of skill to the endgame rather than the the mid game dictating the endgame.
    tatsujb likes this.
  16. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    why thanks! good input :D
  17. mostuniqueusername

    mostuniqueusername Member

    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    54
    You could explain it that way but for what it's worth it isn't that unlikely for 3 bodies in a system to line up perfectly. For example, Earth, Venus and the Sun were briefly in a straight line in both 2004 and 2012. This is called the Venus Transit. Now, for the purposes of PA that's not useful if one of the bodies is a star, but since our solar system is mostly planar I'm sure there are times when 3 planets are in a line.
  18. lucidnightmare

    lucidnightmare Member

    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    35
    I vote for it destroying everything in the way, except for suns.
  19. davostheblack

    davostheblack Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    364
    Likes Received:
    313
    Laser + gas giant = Mini Star!
    christer1966 likes this.
  20. christer1966

    christer1966 Member

    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    55
    Laser + sun = BLACK HOLE!

Share This Page