Re: "the gimmicky laser moon"

Discussion in 'Planetary Annihilation General Discussion' started by portable, September 16, 2014.

  1. portable

    portable Active Member

    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    50
    (Continuation from the locked thread, "It was a mistake to call this a release")

    I have to disagree here, the laser moon was critical to prevent late game stalemates. Now, games actually finish within 30-60 minutes. That's critical given the limitations of the player base ("humans") and the servers (compute time, etc).

    It's a purely functional feature that was artistically implemented.
    Remy561 likes this.
  2. brianpurkiss

    brianpurkiss Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    7,438
    There are more possible solutions to breaking orbital stalemates. IMO, as I've written many times, Asteroid Belts would be a more enjoyable, better balanced, and better way to break orbital stalemates.

    Add drop pods and we have even more options. Add the Unit Cannon alongside asteroid belts, and we're pretty much golden. Possibly finish it off with a heavily armored, large, multi-unit transport and forget about orbital stalemates.

    In its current implementation, Metal Planets just force everyone to try for the same binary strategy, and whoever can get entrenched on the metal planet wins.

    If the Catalyst had an energy cost, or were single use, they'd be better balanced.
    nateious, nlaush, Antiglow and 9 others like this.
  3. cptconundrum

    cptconundrum Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,186
    Likes Received:
    4,900
    The annihilaser gives this game a lot more personality than it had before. Those PAX games never would have been possible without it.
    corteks, nlaush, xanoxis and 6 others like this.
  4. brianpurkiss

    brianpurkiss Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    7,438
    personality ≠ balance.

    The Annihilaser is cool, but has a lot to be desired as far as balance goes.
    bradaz85, Planktum and icycalm like this.
  5. cptconundrum

    cptconundrum Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,186
    Likes Received:
    4,900
    This is a case where overpowered is fun. It does what game enders are supposed to do, but in one of the most ridiculously satisfying ways possible. I wouldn't complain much about a cooldown timer because I try not to complain about things that really don't matter much, but blowing up the entire solar system in seconds can be pretty funny.
    corteks and cdrkf like this.
  6. Shwyx

    Shwyx Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    287
    Noone's arguing that the Annihilaser is a fun (albeit currently imbalanced) addition to the game.

    The point was that there's a huge list of issues plagueing the game right now, both reflected in reviews and customer issues, which should see a higher priority. I won't repeat it, we all know which features are missing.

    Is the laser cool? Yeah. Does it make for an awesome way to introduce PA? Sure. It may have even been easy to implement, programming-wise. But I can't fault people for feeling frustrated when basic functionalities are still missing while flashy features are added.
    Last edited: September 16, 2014
    Planktum likes this.
  7. mered4

    mered4 Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,083
    Likes Received:
    3,149
    Sure. All the noobs going for the biggest weapon in the game made those games more interesting because it forced them to do certain things, like build large armies and stuff.

    In reality, with players who are much better at playing the game than the dudes at PAX (many of their moves made me want to cry), it is easily evident that the catalysts are worthless in games both teams are eager to win.
    I noticed one of the clan wars home systems had a metal planet inside. Made me laugh. I WANT the enemy team to waste their precious eco on securing it. We'll just take the majority of the system (or even just one planet) and start raining hell on them for less of a metal cost. Every time they get close to finishing the five cats, we'll drop 2-3 nukes to restart the process while we hunt down their commanders.

    Is the Annihilaser cool? Hell yes.

    Is it practical in an actual game? Only as bait for noobs.
    xanoxis, igncom1 and squishypon3 like this.
  8. portable

    portable Active Member

    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    50
    Well, spoiler, the developers playing at PAX were putting on a show.
    cptconundrum and Geers like this.
  9. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,356
    Very powerful ≠ imbalanced.

    Balance is very subjective, and there is no real incorrect or correct balance. Just what balance which prefer, with the balance Uber wants the catalyst fits exactly as its supposed to, as a game ender. And as me red pointed out, with real competitive players it still is quite balanced either way.
    corteks likes this.
  10. mjshorty

    mjshorty Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    871
    Likes Received:
    470
    In this game its hard to really predict units that are imbalanced because they tend to be ideal for different roles and different situations

    except Navy, thats underpowered :p
  11. thepilot

    thepilot Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    347
    If only we have (mobile shields) that makes the teleporters survive more than 3 seconds when trying to invade...
  12. Geers

    Geers Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,946
    Likes Received:
    6,820
    YOU REMEMBERED THE E YOU REMEMBERED THE E! WOO!!


    Not sure how I really feel about the Annihilaser right now. Being able to entrench yourself on a planet is pretty bad, but being able to entrench yourself on a superweapon is worse.
    lapsedpacifist likes this.
  13. brianpurkiss

    brianpurkiss Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    7,438
    Not really.

    I didn't say "incorrect" – I said imbalanced. And things can be imbalanced.
  14. portable

    portable Active Member

    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    50
    I played an extremely fun map with 3 moons, 3 metal planets, and a gas giant. The moons won out in the 9-way FFA.
  15. zgrssd

    zgrssd Active Member

    Messages:
    658
    Likes Received:
    185
    They propably had the gas giant. Currently the Jigs give just too many resources fast. It is easy to spam nukes with that income.

    The core issue is that it is hard to properly invade a heavily fortified planet. The anni-laser is a fix, but not the best fix.
    Other things would be, but those need a decent time to be implemented and balanced. Especialyl the unit cannon is a tricky beast to programm.
    Plus there are bigger fish to fry first.
  16. cdrkf

    cdrkf Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    4,793
    Our system has a metal planet... As well as a few other things :p strategically it mixes up the orbital a bit as if someone starts building catalysts it can't be ignored :)

    A great distraction technique imo :p
  17. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    Based on the original design, things like asteroids and metal planet lasers were designed for the late game to be a way of reducing the battlefields size, in order to finally bring the game to a close.

    Either you are there when the blow lands, or you are making a desperate push in a place that can't be targeted, such as the metal planet or asteroid.
  18. lapsedpacifist

    lapsedpacifist Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    877
    Yep, it's all about baiting the enemies metal expenditure onto your half built catalysts. Go ahead and drop 3 nukes on our catalysts every time mered, you can be sure that there's going to be nothing else of value in the AoE, so that's 3 nukes we just distracted from a comm, or production or whatever. If you're careful with how much build power you put on your catalysts you can actually come out ahead in the metal game.

    I quite agree that actually trying to activate the laser is a huge waste of time in almost all games though.
    cptconundrum and cdrkf like this.
  19. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    Well, like, if they aren't coming at you, it can still be cheaper then a bunch o' nukes
    cdrkf likes this.
  20. MrTBSC

    MrTBSC Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,857
    Likes Received:
    1,823
    nope, thanks i rather not have shields and the turtleformation in this game ...
    for that mobile armor(vanguard) and anti missile/shell PD is for me as far as i want it to go ...
    Last edited: September 16, 2014

Share This Page