DOX

Discussion in 'Balance Discussions' started by milkdragon, August 12, 2014.

  1. milkdragon

    milkdragon New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    9
    My thought about the new Patch super buff Dox.

    In 1v1 game going Dox only is more effective and cheaper than tanks. With Dox being able to be everywhere at once compared to tanks, the person that goes tanks loses all their expansions because you use end up just pointless chasing Dox hordes . Also the speed of the Dox in small groups makes them literary untouchable by bombers. With losing all your expansions to Dox you lose your ability to mass tank up to combat the swarm of Dox, and its just a snowball effect once that happens.
    In the old meta Dox were honestly in my opinion almost fine.

    At this point the person with better micro will win the match.

    Pros before
    -Cheap
    -Mobile/Raiding
    - Fast ROF
    Pro after
    -Cheap
    -Mobile/Raiding
    - Fast ROF
    - AA Unit
    - Amphibious
    - Better Range
    - Better Sight
    - Micro friendly(more for the EXP players)
    - Swarmable(because of the range increase)

    Cons
    - weak alone

    not one other unit in PA has this many positive traits for it. I feel if they have to have a sight and range debuff but not as much as the old meta, but enough so they can't single handedly take on tanks then I would say that would be a start.
    Last edited: August 12, 2014
    killerkiwijuice and mot9001 like this.
  2. ef32

    ef32 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    454
    Dox are really fun to play now. If anything, only price should be higher, dox stats are sweet. Anything less than that and they will suck again.
    drewsuser likes this.
  3. KNight

    KNight Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,681
    Likes Received:
    3,268
    Depends on exactly how you feel about the Dox, for myself(and seemingly the OP as well to some degree) the issue isn't so much the stats themselves (thought there is room for tweaking still) but rather all the extra capabilities the Dox Acquired.

    Mike
    improvised1, EdWood and stuart98 like this.
  4. mered4

    mered4 Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,083
    Likes Received:
    3,149
    Mixed armies > Dox only.

    Nothing can convince me otherwise right now. I invite you to try it.
  5. Imsvale

    Imsvale Active Member

    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    58
    Wondible did. Dox won. How did you test it?
  6. cdrkf

    cdrkf Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    4,793
    Agreed *if your playing land*... dox are very op where there's lots of water involved. The other point though is that the *proportion* of dox to other units is rather high in the bit of testing I've been doing. You need lots of groups of dox to raid / defend against raids (or build allot of light defence towers everywhere- which is an option).

    The real question is though- how many dox is reasonable? Currently I feel like the ratio is about 4 dox : 1 of anything else works quite well, which is perhaps why they feel a little op right now?
  7. mered4

    mered4 Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,083
    Likes Received:
    3,149
    I was talking mixed tanks and grenadiers. Mixing dox with anything else is stupid and a waste of metal UNLESS you are defending a small area and it's all you have.
  8. mered4

    mered4 Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,083
    Likes Received:
    3,149
    He didn't test in an actual game. He tested an instantaneous metal-metal comparison. It's been proven that you need about a third more eco and factories then your opponent to match Dox vs mixed, and more if the other person goes pure ants.
  9. Imsvale

    Imsvale Active Member

    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    58
    Not sure about the exact proportion, but yes, this is true. (Hell, I did that quite thoroughly myself.) I wanted to clarify how you had done the testing though. If you had done a metal by metal comparison and gotten a very different result, that would be very interesting. So it's all good, and I'm inclined to agree. Equal metal army, Dox win. Real game, completely different.
    milkdragon likes this.
  10. milkdragon

    milkdragon New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    9
    In theory works betters. But in practice may prove you differently
  11. Xagar

    Xagar Active Member

    Messages:
    321
    Likes Received:
    117
    The details were in another thread, but the person in question did a number of 10-minute skirmishes, trying to build the most units of either type possible, on the same maps and on randomly-generated ones, so as to get a good sample size.
    mered4 likes this.
  12. mered4

    mered4 Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,083
    Likes Received:
    3,149
    The point is, you can outmatch an opponent going pure Dox by simply going half dox - half tanks, or in some cases, 65/35.
  13. mayhemster

    mayhemster Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    394
    Likes Received:
    425
    I totally disagree with this. In every match where I have added in some other units, then that is the tipping-point where I have fallen behind. My tanks get kited and my dox get out-numbered until the difference in units is significant and then I'm as good as beat.
    websterx01 likes this.
  14. Clopse

    Clopse Post Master General

    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    2,865
    Ants are better in combat and defending. But only useful on maps with a lot of metal or choke points. If the dox player expands quickly and harasses passively they will have the advantage. When you need to spread your base to expand dox are much better.

    Edit: This is after many games against some of the best 1v1 PA players. I gave them a chance when others wouldn't.
    Quitch and igncom1 like this.
  15. Imsvale

    Imsvale Active Member

    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    58
    Hmm, yes, that was me. :p
  16. mot9001

    mot9001 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    833
    Likes Received:
    650
    Delete topic pls, he said Dox.
  17. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    So yeah, the dox might be a little too versatile.

    And we could probably move some of the functionality to the T1 tank scout, or a new T1 bot.


    Also, considering that the inferno is a tanky slow flame unit.

    Can we have a quick fast flamer bot, possibly with a weaker flamer, for tagging bot swarms?
  18. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,357
    I'd love to see a riot unit in PA, a unit with a slow cooking huge flame would be great, basically... longer range and more aoe but muuuch less damage.
    igncom1 likes this.
  19. milkdragon

    milkdragon New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    9
    honestly mered test your theory and bring proof. Play people of similar skill and test it.
    mot9001 likes this.
  20. mered4

    mered4 Post Master General

    Messages:
    4,083
    Likes Received:
    3,149
    I have been. Well, on patch day. Not yesterday. I'll be testing some today.

Share This Page