Weakest Link Tourney (3 v 3)

Discussion in 'Planetary Annihilation General Discussion' started by cdrkf, June 18, 2014.

  1. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    both even! I may also cast but I need help from you to be there on time.
  2. cdrkf

    cdrkf Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    4,793
    Help from me?
  3. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    I'm experience neither in tourneys nor in casting. I don't know if we would be casting live or with the replay file, rather on youtube or twitch. what times ect.
  4. cdrkf

    cdrkf Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    4,793
    Ah Ok, well I've never done any casting either so I'm not sure I can help you much there. Oath and Brian do quite a bit of this so they'd probably be able to give you advice on what software to use and so on.

    Brian usually records and uploads to youtube later, Oath I think usually casts live via Twitch- either would be fine.

    If you're playing you probably don't want to cast your game live (as theoretically your opponents could tune into your stream for some extra intel :D) so I'd suggest you record the game and post it later? I'll add any videos of the event into the OP as and when they're available.

    As for timings- basically have your casting software ready to go and turn up for the event (ideally 15 mins before we plan to start). I've just had confirmation from Oath that I can use the PACE teamspeak server as a meeting point for this one. Just as a reminder, the time will be 6 pm UTC (adjust accordingly for your time zone).
  5. Clopse

    Clopse Post Master General

    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    2,865
    So if you lose a commander your team loses? That the general idea?
  6. cdrkf

    cdrkf Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    4,793
    Kinda, it isn't a given that you can't win if you loose 1 commander- however you're going to be at a disadvantage as it will become 3 v 2.
  7. Clopse

    Clopse Post Master General

    Messages:
    2,535
    Likes Received:
    2,865
    Ah cool. That's fine. Otherwise it would be snipe cheese heaven. Classic 3v3 tourny sounds great. Most likely will play as I like this kind of competition. More fun.
    reptarking and cdrkf like this.
  8. reptarking

    reptarking Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,321
    Likes Received:
    1,577
    Clopse want to do a three generals strat? One bot one air one vehicle?
  9. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    .
    Last edited: June 19, 2014
  10. lapsedpacifist

    lapsedpacifist Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    877
    Aah damn I'm away from the 4th - 6th :(

    Sounds like a lot of fun, hopefully we'll field a good promethean team.
    Presumably you won't be playing cdrkf?

    Hope it comes off well, I'll be interested to watch the casts.
  11. cdrkf

    cdrkf Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    4,793
    Yeah I think it would be better that I try and keep things going rather than trying to play at the same time...

    I spoke to Commisioner Holt and Cmdflop on TS yesterday and I think they're going to try and put a team together.

    Brian and Oath are down for casting, and it looks like Tasjub and WPmarshall are going to record their games so there should be some good videos after this one :)
  12. Debosse

    Debosse Member

    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    63
    Looking forward to this tournament. I hope we win :rolleyes:
    tatsujb and cdrkf like this.
  13. jonasmod

    jonasmod Active Member

    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    190
    Great initiative! Cannot participate, though. Looking forward to more 2v2 tournaments in the future!
    cdrkf likes this.
  14. SatanPetitCul

    SatanPetitCul Active Member

    Messages:
    267
    Likes Received:
    197
    You are flattering me :D
    But i m not good anymore with the rebalance.

    I'm often out the week end especialy with the summer. a next time maybe.
    tatsujb likes this.
  15. Debosse

    Debosse Member

    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    63
    Don't worry you have been replaced :cool: (probably nowhere near as good)
    tatsujb likes this.
  16. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    don't undermine yourself! :)

    And yeah, @SatanPetitCul, most definitely!
  17. cdrkf

    cdrkf Post Master General

    Messages:
    5,721
    Likes Received:
    4,793
    Ok Commisioner Holt has just made a very valid point: As we are playing non-shared teams there is an oppertunity for abuse of Sepcating + Teamspeak.

    I have a simple solution which hopefully everyone can agree on:

    There are slots available in the PACE TS channel so each team can have their own TS (very useful for team games). However once a player is eliminated it is their responsibility to ensure they leave their teams dedicated TS channel and return to the main lobby. That way they can't be giving away intel to their remaining team-mates. The only other option would be to request that dead players leave the game.

    Anyone have any other thoughts on this?
  18. wondible

    wondible Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,315
    Likes Received:
    2,089
    There was no total vision during one of Metabolical's casts, and I just tested it with some AI (remained on team vision and couldn't change vision settings) However, it does grant the spectator economy/army panel, which is still some information leakage.
  19. jonathanstey

    jonathanstey Member

    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    24
    I can maybe cast too.
  20. sookrispy

    sookrispy Active Member

    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    63
    I am not to keen or fond of non shared team armies seeing there is still some stuff to
    be worked on. Can we get a pole on who would prefer shared armies as apposed to non-shared armies?

Share This Page