Econ Idea for Team Armies and Team Alliances

your strike a point that backs my argument and that I'll highlight : what would be the difference between the two then? not much.

not to mention I still have no answer to what you think of this being turned against you? as I highlighted above.
what if at the surprise com rush your com is the first to go out? and even thoughyou managed to take out their best player their team still knows what to do with the coms since a com rush is simple enough, and finish out his original plan?

I provided some possible solutions to combomb with a mere minute of reflection, but your suggestion... I've been going over and over it and I can't see how it helps you with your combomb predicament.
the way I see it the two are apples and oranges. they cannot be one another's action and reaction. you must have made some sort of bridge in your head deciding they could influence one another, but they can't.

If i am out im out ... thats it i cant influence the match anymore
and so the rest of team are on their own to continue its about which team wins in the end ... and how many players remained ...
you wont risk to combomb at all if you want to stay in game ... in that case commbombing would be a last resort at best .... at worst players decide to go suicide early to be help to team at the expence of knowing that they are out ...
however a all commrush would be harder to pull of since you would need all of the team and also have a risk when scouted as in you losing overview and the enemy beeing able
to attack your base first to weaken you and finishing you of with additional units
thats how i imagine it at least ...

For crying out loud.

If you want to play Alliances, play alliances.

Team armies is DIFFERENT to alliances.

There is a fundamental difference in gametype.

Any suggestion that you should turn alliances into armies, or vice versa, just betrays that you don't understand the difference between them.

I understand VERY MUCH what the difference is between alliance and teamgames ...

Team alliance has player kick on commander death.

Team Armies doesn't.

Otherwise they're the same game type.

ESPECIALLY when Uber implement gifting units to your team mates.

No they are totaly not .....

Elaborate

Teamarmy = only one eco for all
alliance= each has his own eco
this alone changes the playstyle
the uper requires even more communication of what poeple build
Otherwise one or more screws up everybody
especialy if you are on different planets

The later merely occassionaly asks hey can you give a bit of x or built me that and change control the risk with screwing with the others eco is not there
and you dont get that...hey who took my x fabbers or the like

Oh The smile on your face
Lets me know that you need me.

You say it best when you say nothing at all.

Edit : oh lol you updated.

The eco problem is even worse.
You don't even know when your teammates are being incompetent and crashing their economy, at least you can save them if bad things happen normally.

I would say that communication is a bigger problem. Every one needs to be confident and aware of what their role in the game is.

At least with team armies if someone starts teching when they should be spamming the front line you can put them on the right track immediately.

Course, the stealing people's stuff unnecessarily is just rude, and comes as a part of not knowing whose stuff is whose.

If you dont mind i would like to continue the discussion on the thread it was intended for
and also look on my last post again

The thread is whether team armies should morph into Alliances. Our posts are utterly on topic.

I agree, the idea of sharing units, a base, and econ are fine, but the commander you spawn with should be yours and your alone. I never really liked the idea of someone being able to take your commander. Of course i mean team armys for my post.

there's a game mode coming for it for the last time, just be patient.
read what you haven't read yet and then read this thread https://forums.uberent.com/threads/...icated-to-comm-player-in-teamarmygames.55655/
you're a little behind.

As far as the topic goes, i sight should be the only shared item with your allies. Just my opinion.

there. right there that's the problem. You have no idea what game mode you're in there are no allies so far. wake up!

that game mode is coming but it's not here yet.

Im aware of the game mode, ive been here for a great deal of time now (since alpha). My post above, points out that in team alliance games i think sight should be the only thing shared...

And you should calm down and not assume that i have no idea what im talking about, i have just as much right to post here as you.

ok .