Gatling Bertha

Discussion in 'Backers Lounge (Read-only)' started by snownebula, November 21, 2013.

?

Bring Gatling Bertha back?

  1. Hell Yes!

    57 vote(s)
    79.2%

  2. No.

    15 vote(s)
    20.8%
Page 3 of 3
  1. Nullimus

    Nullimus Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    260
    Yes and no. LOL
    Nullimus, December 4, 2013
    #41
  2. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    That is fair.

    Although pelters are really funny when they go from a 90 degree shooting angle to direct fire.
    igncom1, December 4, 2013
    #42
  3. brianpurkiss

    brianpurkiss Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    7,438
    A big hell no on this one.

    Catapults, Pelters, and Holkins are already over powered enough as it is.

    We don't need a long range rapid fire artillery piece.
    brianpurkiss, December 4, 2013
    #43
    krakanu likes this.
  4. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    They most diffidently need to be changed, that is a fact.
    igncom1, December 4, 2013
    #44
  5. brianpurkiss

    brianpurkiss Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,879
    Likes Received:
    7,438
    I don't know about changed. Maybe, but maybe not.

    I vote for an anti catapult anti artillery unit and structure.

    Reasonings: https://forums.uberent.com/threads/planetary-invasions.54449/

    Needed for planetary invasions and it helps counter pelters and catapults without being so unbalanced as shields.
    brianpurkiss, December 4, 2013
    #45
  6. ace63

    ace63 Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,067
    Likes Received:
    826
    Well I am all for nerfing static defenses. I still think a rapid fire artillery would be cool, but yes - the defenses you named are way over the top.
    ace63, December 4, 2013
    #46
Page 3 of 3

Share This Page