Ive got to ask....

Discussion in 'Backers Lounge (Read-only)' started by shotforce13, November 18, 2013.

  1. shotforce13

    shotforce13 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    543
    Likes Received:
    400
    I got looking at the unit scale concept art pictures and wow, the level of detail in those buildings is absolutely gorgeous (pic below). so to my question, are we playing with a bunch of place holders? of course im just curious. unit_scale_2_1280.jpg
  2. cmdandy

    cmdandy Active Member

    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    118
    Nope, no place holders for us. There are a number of disparities between the concept art and the final game graphics; just take a look at those mountains in the background. Now THOSE are terrain features (not the crappy plateaus and 'mountains' we are lugged with at the moment).
  3. KNight

    KNight Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,681
    Likes Received:
    3,268
    The Assets used in the Scale Concepts were primarily from the Visualization, which of course was not in-game footage.

    Mike
    stormingkiwi and archcommander like this.
  4. ghost1107

    ghost1107 Active Member

    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    181
    I just noticed that the commander are just as big as a tree.:D

    EDIT: Lets not turn this into a scale discussion we already have an other topic for that.
    Scale is all wrong in that picture and ingame.
  5. nanolathe

    nanolathe Post Master General

    Messages:
    3,839
    Likes Received:
    1,887
    The scale in that picture isn't wrong at all.

    What strikes me most is how much better the Commanders look in that picture when they hold a neutral stance, rather than the stiff-as-a-board, one-size-fits-all 'combat ready' stance we have now.
  6. thetrophysystem

    thetrophysystem Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,050
    Likes Received:
    2,874
    That doesn't worry me as much. Functioning features are a priority. Bones and animation can be done by modders.

    I can live with basic one vanilla everything. I just hope that the patching goes on. Just like minecraft. Also, that they finish it and don't release until it is at least as bug free as minecraft on release was.

    Wait. Wasn't one of the question about placeholder graphics? That isn't a yes or no question. The answer is, the graphics that you see are work they intend to include ingame. However, they can add more to existing ones, modify existing ones, add textures, add smaller pieces to existing pieces, ect.

    It's possible we might get detail texture or detail mesh or additional procedural terrain features.
  7. Culverin

    Culverin Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    582
    I think the difference you see isn't a model issue, it's a lighting issue.
    These are the same models developed from the art team and used as game assets.

    I'll let the tech gurus weight in here, but from what I remember, the upcoming patches will refine the lighting and shading so it looks closer to this concept.
    LavaSnake and archcommander like this.
  8. rorschachphoenix

    rorschachphoenix Active Member

    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    89
    And the camera angle again...
  9. nixtempestas

    nixtempestas Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,216
    Likes Received:
    746
    A lot of the lighting settings can already be changed in the .json files in the game folder

    even just playing around with the ambient settings can get way better results.

Share This Page