The t1 PG (power generators) are still too high.

Yes we got that from your first post, but we don't understand what your reasoning is for that claim.

Mike

They got almost the same size has acu!
And its only basic generators ,looks a copy off Supreeme commander 2..



The basic power off PA showld be smaller ,in comparation to his cost ,you got all planet to build,but obvius you wont buid power in all planet.
The Actual size off basic power showld be the size off advanced power,that will give the units mutch moore free space to walk,we already got too many obstacles on the planet.



Look at the size,off basic power off Forged aliance in comparation to the commander


Sry but i play supreeme commander 2 time to times,and the structure economy seems almost the same has PA.

Sometimes it's lonely being the guy who prefers SupCom2 over FA.....But what can I say, I used to have a bad computer and preferred a more casual game.

Actualy i find on SupCom2 ,the best experimental units i ever find in any rts game.

Sad they being so poorly harnessed.
That was a glorius work on all that awsome units.
But the eco system off sup2 its........

I like it, on a casual note, as it really helped my mates get into a SupCom like game before using a proper streaming economy.

That and minor experimental are just T2 units anyway Megalith II for the freaking win.

again with this ??????

We are not free to justify what we do not like.
Or there were new rules!

I think there is still democracy!

Not easy to find subjects that have already been spoken.
There are over 216 pages with posts, and exists no index.

FYI, In the PA general discussion there is a index sticky. Called Topic Index - BACKLOG COMPLETE 05/10. Also have the forum built-in search function.

Are we seriously discussing that the T1 energy generators are too tall compared to the commanders? You realize this is two different games on a different scale. Personally I find it more realistic because energy plants are ******* huge in real life.

Kalherine generally wants everything to be as close to SupCom as possible.

So I've noticed but it doesn't make the conversation any less silly.

Ye call me silly.
But when in 2014 iff the game wont sell because the hard world we got outside ,and the new releasedes ,im already imagine what magazine, gamers critics will say.

Look what hapend to GPG and to all Chris Taylor team,and they are a fantastic team.

When no one listen to old players that maybe( maybe) now what is need to play a game for loooong time,not only 3 or 4 months.

Then i will see ppl say! PA was a promise game but.............
And then i will have just another game ,that i buy on a digital format like sup2 ,that no one plays after 6 months.

Seems only players that havent , play a good rts game for long are taking this game to the rong options.

Think ,we are about 1000/1300 players off FA(F) comunity that play long time ,because Forged aliance its the most perfect rts ever made.
Must be by some reason that we are on the oposite side off PA players thoughts.

This was last time i post or talk anithing about PA.


I dont play PA ,because i got Supreeme commander 2 that its bether, and eco ,and structure off the game ,its the same has PA in so many things,and PG its not whats worst on PA ,i just talk about it because its a copy off power generators off Sup2.

Im a hardcore gamer ,i play all kind games ,i lost the count on beta games i buy and fall down.

Maybe thats wy im so direct on my thoughts.


I wast +100 euros on PA, wy you think im worry?
Hope the game have a great victory in this hard industry.

So you're saying the game won't sell because the power generators are too tall?

Or... the game won't sell because it isn't exactly like some other game? I'd say other games, like Starcraft or Command and Conquer or Age of Empires, prove you wrong. Also the fact that PA broke the record of the largest crowdfunded project when it came out.

PA is going to be a genre changing RTS game.

You can't change a genre by making it exactly like some other RTS.

So your saying PA is going to fail.........because you don't agree with the visuals of the Power Generator?!?!

Mike

All right, this conversation is nonsensical.

a) The game is going to fail because of power generator aesthetics. Wat

b) "1000-1300" players is a large part of the playerbase Uber is aiming for. Wat

c) 'innovation is bad you have to be like THIS SPECIFIC GAME THAT I LIKE or you will be a failure'. Wat

Look, I understand you like the game(I would hope if you spend 100 euros on it), but saying the game is going to fail because the T1 power generators are 'too tall' is silly and ... really, really nonsensical.

If you like FAF, nothing is stopping you from continuing to play FAF. Let PA be the game that Uber wants it to be. Add in your feedback wherever possible, because I'm sure they're looking at all of it to try to make the game the fans want, but saying the game is going to fail for a completely nonsensical reason is just... very much not helpful.

Actually, i see more players playing Halowars than i do in FAF. You are just being stupid. Most of us are long time RTS players, and many of us came from supcom backgrounds. Also, if you were a hard core gamer, i would have noticed you playing PA by now. And yet, i dont. You amuse me with your trolling, but just stop.

Now that is an elitist statement right there.

gj, welcome to who i am. If she said something constructive as to why PA will fail rather than aesthetic of a certain building, i would be less aggresive.

And that is a good reason to get aggressive....how?