would like for zoom panning to make it back into the game

Discussion in 'Planetary Annihilation General Discussion' started by tatsujb, October 12, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. rorschachphoenix

    rorschachphoenix Active Member

    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    89
    No way! Greatest threads ever! Please don't stop! :)
  2. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    Uber any thoughts about this idea?
  3. neutrino

    neutrino low mass particle Uber Employee

    Messages:
    3,123
    Likes Received:
    2,687
    My thought is that I'm really unhappy with the current camera and it needs a big revision. We still have a lot of experimentation to do in that area and certainly some of the ideas here can be tested.
  4. Culverin

    Culverin Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    582
    YAY!!!
    Can't ask much more than this :)
    bradaz85 likes this.
  5. mushroomars

    mushroomars Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,655
    Likes Received:
    319
    I loved Ozone's fan engine. I think the zoom would work *exactly* like it does in his sim. A few changes could be made, like how smooth the transition is between planets, how precise you have to be with zooming to a new planet, and how planet rotation affects the camera, but aside from that it is entirely spot-on.
  6. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    MushrooMars! you would know, did the engine have units? what am I doing wrong?
    when I start a system I have a system with planets that i can look around on but nothing is clickable and there are no units.
    is it incompatible with chromium?
    Last edited: October 15, 2013
  7. mushroomars

    mushroomars Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,655
    Likes Received:
    319
    No, the units were just a concept by Ozone. What you see there is as far as the engine ever got. He also planned on adding exploding asteroids and headlights to units, but never got around to it because he didn't have enough free time.

    Those "screenshots" of all that awesome stuff happening are mockups.
  8. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    awww phoosie!
    oh well, still great work. it looks gorgeous. and works brilliant, navigation mechanism-wise.
  9. schuesseled192

    schuesseled192 Active Member

    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    219
    2d top down view is more user friendly
  10. mushroomars

    mushroomars Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,655
    Likes Received:
    319
    Ironically Ozone's engine is more user-friendly than Uber's top-down view. I'm not criticizing Uber, I'm just pointing out that for once logic didn't work like we thought it would.

    I guess going from 3d -> 2d is more confusing than being whipped about haphazardly in 3d space.
    tatsujb likes this.
  11. Culverin

    Culverin Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    582
    It's not just the jump to 2D, but the jump back into a planet view is problematic as well.
    You lose your last zoomed location. When it comes to UI design, the player looses continuity.
    Zoom in/Zoom out should be exact opposites.
    It's like Undo/Redo. They should be affecting the exact same thing in opposite ways.


    Whereas with an entirely live view, you can fine tune your approach when zooming back in.
    ghost1107, kalherine and tatsujb like this.
  12. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    this. THIS, like ....so much!
  13. Culverin

    Culverin Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    582
    Can more people weigh in on this thread please?
    I think it's rather important part of the UI experience.

    The "hopping between planets" is just a saved view.
    But we've lost true strategic zoom out to the solar system level.
  14. smallcpu

    smallcpu Active Member

    Messages:
    744
    Likes Received:
    72
    Personally I don't see much reason to discuss too much about the UI (zooming being a part of it) as its obviously not finished/not a good UI yet and I fully expect that uber knows that.

    There hasn't been much fundamental UI work done so I expect it to be revised greatly and then feedback would be appropriate.

    (Or the current UI is nearly done and then we're all doooooooomed.:eek:)
  15. tatsujb

    tatsujb Post Master General

    Messages:
    12,902
    Likes Received:
    5,385
    I dissagree, now 's the time or never.
  16. Culverin

    Culverin Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    582
    I'm going to be obnoxious and bump this one.
    I'd like to hear what else the community has to say.
  17. Culverin

    Culverin Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    582
    Ooooh, look at the zoomed out planetary level...




  18. halander1

    halander1 Member

    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    4
    +infinite, i love the idea, its beautiful.
  19. Culverin

    Culverin Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,069
    Likes Received:
    582
    [​IMG]


    It's IN!!!!
    mother freaking gorgeous!!!!!!


    And HELLS YES.
    Friction control. :D
  20. patashu

    patashu New Member

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    3
    Please continue to do the lord's work, Culverin :D
    The loudest voices must be the most informed and educated to keep discourse healthy.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page