http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/space-jam-sequel-finds-director-834978 Question mark exclamation point
Why don't movie makers ever understand certain things can only work ONCE (not to metion in a certain time period)
Aww man it was going well and then... Slime gags.... Blatant fan service... Ugh.... I mean, it's better but... If you escaped from Mao's China to Stalin's Russia that'd also be "better". Oh and the ghost that possesses Thor is the big baddens, I'm calling it now.
The original website for the first movie hasn't been updated in 20 years. http://www.warnerbros.com/archive/spacejam/movie/jam.htm
That black woman character sure is every black woman character ever. I wonder how many times she'll say "aw HELL NAW".
I really don't want to see this movie, nor do I agree with many choices that came with it but... Yeah there's a slim gag, it's a Ghostbusters flick! Why is this fan service bad? Specifically? It's only bad when it actually damages the original intentions / direction a story was going in.
It's NOT subtle at all. I mean, they literally pointed out Slimer, and then there was that scene in an office with the "We don't want mass hysteria nudgenudge remember that line?" And then flucking marshmellow man shows up. WHY IS HE THERE!?
yesterday and i think i can safely recommend watching it no it isn´t better than future past imo but it´s definitively quite the spectical and a good closure to the second trilogy
