Star Wars BattleANTICLIMAX

Discussion in 'Unrelated Discussion' started by Geers, April 17, 2015.

  1. wpmarshall

    wpmarshall Planetary Moderator

    Messages:
    1,868
    Likes Received:
    2,989
    I'm very cautious about this.
    Didn't they say that there would be 3 or maps per planet? This is probably one of those rather than a 'mode' as such.
    Plus, i'm not hugely keen on the idea of having to hunt only 1 thing - I'd rather have some element of strategy in space battles - targets to weaken the enemy as it were rather than target to win.
  2. Geers

    Geers Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,946
    Likes Received:
    6,820
    No it's a mode. Some aerial Search and Destroy type thingy.

    the title says "Fighter Squadron Mode".
  3. wpmarshall

    wpmarshall Planetary Moderator

    Messages:
    1,868
    Likes Received:
    2,989
    Hollywood says a character is dead - do you believe them?

    This is EA and marketing remember :p
  4. Geers

    Geers Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,946
    Likes Received:
    6,820
    Yes but this would be bordering straight-up lying. As in, illegal false advertising.


    If this isn't a proper mode, that means some other mode is happening. And if that's the case, well there would be evidence of that.
  5. wpmarshall

    wpmarshall Planetary Moderator

    Messages:
    1,868
    Likes Received:
    2,989
    Not necessarily, as one could call it a mode.... that just happens to be exclusive to certain maps etc... or rather maps that are exclusive to certain modes.

    For instance that ATAT 'on rails' 'mode' on hoth looked horribly linear - I would be surprised if there wasn't a separate hoth maps with KOTH type play... which would be a 'mode' and 'map' ... if you see where I'm coming from.
  6. Geers

    Geers Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,946
    Likes Received:
    6,820
    What's Koth? The KDE version of Star Wars? :p.
  7. wpmarshall

    wpmarshall Planetary Moderator

    Messages:
    1,868
    Likes Received:
    2,989
    King Of The Hill
    or probably more likely to capture the point
  8. Geers

    Geers Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,946
    Likes Received:
    6,820
    IT WAS A JOKE.

    :(:(. You have brought shame to your tech-savvy brethren!
  9. tehtrekd

    tehtrekd Post Master General

    Messages:
    2,996
    Likes Received:
    2,772
  10. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    There are people who only get Call of Duty for the campaigns.

    SP people just aren't vocal, or as vocal as the MP crowd.
  11. stuart98

    stuart98 Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,009
    Likes Received:
    3,888
    Is anyone here even considering getting the game still at this point?
  12. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    Im not much of a MP guy, so no not really.

    Although to be fair, the first Star Wars shoot em up I ever played was renegade squadron for the PSP...it was like 1 of 3 games I had for it, and was quite decent.
  13. wpmarshall

    wpmarshall Planetary Moderator

    Messages:
    1,868
    Likes Received:
    2,989
    After all the dlc has come out
  14. igncom1

    igncom1 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,961
    Likes Received:
    3,132
    I dunno, but I have played the first few COD games campaigns....and they are fairly decent.
  15. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,357
    I don't know.. It's kind of true, I myself love story based games with some multiplayer, but a lot of games are just built for multiplayer.

    Nobody plays for the single player in COD, there is none in tf2, in CSGO, in Titanfall... etc... a lot of games are multiplayer exclusive.
  16. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,357
    I'm thinking about it, will wait for its price to go down though probably.
  17. arseface

    arseface Post Master General

    Messages:
    1,804
    Likes Received:
    502
    When I was in college and I was forced to associate with CoD players, we definitely mixed it up between single, versus, online, and co-op.

    I liked the singleplayer/co-op more. The versus/online was boring. Everybody dies to only one headshot and you never get properly ambushed by like 12 dudes.
  18. Geers

    Geers Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,946
    Likes Received:
    6,820
    I've said it before and I'll say it again. DICE makes **** campaigns. The only reason I don't think BF4's campaign is worse than Warfighter's is because BF4 was pitifully short.
  19. squishypon3

    squishypon3 Post Master General

    Messages:
    7,971
    Likes Received:
    4,357
    What about Bad Company though? <333

    When was this? The single player campaigns are laughable now and are only included as they think they need it. (I don't like how it's multilayer plays out either, I was only pointing out why most people get the games.)
  20. Geers

    Geers Post Master General

    Messages:
    6,946
    Likes Received:
    6,820
    That just had the advantage of being not bad. It wasn't really that good.

    And their more recent efforts have been horrid. BF4 especially felt like it had a campaign not because they wanted to make one, but because EA told them they needed to have one.

    Let them near Star Wars and they'll come up with something worse than Phantom Menace.

Share This Page